CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131JUD001823211
31 janvier 2017
of 4 and 19 March. 16.
Page 66 sur 295
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1925439-2022411
22 février 2007
The linguistic report of 18 March was not taken into consideration on the grounds that the expert had no licence to carry out linguistic examinations.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159737
9 décembre 2015
On 31 March 2008 the applicant left a message on the official website of the President of Russia ( www.kremlin.ru ), which was not made public.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2405754-2591243
23 juin 2008
He arrived in Austria in 1990 at the age of six, spent the rest of his childhood and his adolescence there and speaks the language.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-851971-872904
14 octobre 2003
In March 1996 the Competition Council fined the applicant company 30,000,000 French francs (more than 4,500,000 euros) for abuse of a dominant position and ordered it to pay the costs of publishing
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14365
9 juillet 2024
In March 2021 the Supreme Court quashed part of the trial court’s judgment in respect of the first and third applicants and amended their prison sentences.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14491
10 juillet 2025
The Bologna sentence supervision court upheld the order of 8 January 2013 and in March 2014 the Court of Cassation declared the applicant’s appeal on points of law inadmissible, finding that the
Tribunal Administratif de Dijon
DTA_2201468_20230104
4 janvier 2023
532-1 du code de justice administrative, en vue de déterminer l'origine et l'étendue des désordres affectant les vestiaires du stade du Bourg, dont la construction a été réalisée en exécution d'un marché
Cour d'Appel
6253c9f0bd3db21cbdd899fb
8 novembre 2007
par Mademoiselle LANGLOIS en vertu d'un pouvoir général SAS Z...
5ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_19LY04758_20220609
9 juin 2022
l'EURL Mercuel n'a pas commis d'acte anormal de gestion alors que l'administration ne démontre pas d'appauvrissement de la société à des fins étrangères à son intérêt ; elle a d'ailleurs réalisé une marge
ECLI:CEDH:003-797107-814338
24 juillet 2003
The judgment was set aside by the Presidium of the Regional Court on 19 March 1999 and the applicant’s claims dismissed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0226JUD001285987
26 février 1992
In its report of 5 March 1991 (Article 31) (art. 31), it expressed the unanimous opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6 para. 1 (art. 6-1).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0226JUD001292387
On that date, the court called for a further medical opinion and adjourned the case to 1 March 1989. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0227JUD001278387
27 février 1992
The proceedings were reopened by a writ filed with the court registry on 24 March 1987.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC001484908
12 mai 2009
On the basis of the Franco-German treaty of 31 March 1981, the Federal Republic of Germany made available 250 million marks to the “Fondation Entente Franco-Allemande”, a foundation established under French
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0323JUD001414688
23 mars 1994
Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 23 March 1994.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002579413
22 novembre 2016
According to the Government the first applicant did not request a booklet in another language. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0511DEC003175302
11 mai 2006
France , judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613DEC002296215
13 juin 2017
1410/2005, 21 March 2011) the Human Rights Committee found that Article 25 applied where the complaint concerned Presidential elections. COMPLAINTS 33.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD005671309
14 avril 2015
In establishing the existence of this risk they referred to the applicant’s knowledge of foreign languages and to the fact that he had previously travelled abroad.