The Court further notes that the final-instance court took a fresh position on facts which were decisive for the determination of the applicant’s guilt, based on evidence which it was able

The text of the decision stated, inter alia, the following: “...at the hearing Mr Khakhkhorov fully admitted his guilt in the commission of the infraction under Article 18.8 § 1 of the CAO and explained

B A, représenté par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision par laquelle le président de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques (FNSP) a rejeté sa demande tendant à la

remand is refused following the termination of the proceedings may raise an issue under Article 6 para. 2 (Art. 6-2) if the supporting reasoning amounts in substance to a determination of the accused's guilt

A..., représenté par la SCP Reche-Guille Meghabbar, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 3 avril 2025 par lequel le préfet de l’Aude a refusé de l’admettre au séjour et l’a obligé à quitter

[N] [R] représentée par Me Laurent SAUTEREL de la SELARL SAUTEREL, avocat au barreau de LYON, substitué par Me Michaël GUILLE, avocat au même barreau INTIMÉE : CPAM DU RHÔNE Service contentieux

A B, représenté par la SCP Reche-Guille-Meghabbar, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 22 novembre 2024 par lequel le préfet de l'Aude a rejeté sa demande de titre de séjour, a assorti son

Besides, Dr M. carried out an examination of the scene of the incident and participated in the first post-mortem examination; his findings at the time did not exclude the applicant’s guilt.

been possible to establish whether and if so, to what extent, the drug deal had been provoked by him, this question being a decisive factor for the fixing of a sentence corresponding to the applicant’s guilt

It awarded him 25,000 guilders (NLG) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and also made an award in respect of costs.

It found that the lower court had taken into consideration the nature and seriousness of the moral suffering caused to the applicant, as well as the degree of guilt of the defendant.

presumption of the applicant’s innocence and thus his right to a fair trial in that, in the reasons of the decision to revoke the suspension, it had gone into an in-depth analysis of the applicant’s guilt

Saratov Regional Court, in the absence of the applicant and without providing him with assistance by counsel, dismissed the applicant’s appeal statement, having found that the Town Court’s findings of his guilt

Was it arbitrary to justify the finding of guilt with reference to a record of administrative offence used as a piece of (adverse) evidence?

As to the proceedings leading to the conviction, the Court of Appeal had not based its finding of guilt solely on the evidence of witnesses against the applicant.

Pyrénées-Atlantiques a déclaré d'utilité publique l'aménagement du chemin départemental n° 261 dans la section comprise entre le chemin départemental n° 123 à Urt et l'intersection avec la voie communale n° 1 de Guiche

William ZEGHBIB en qualité de juge commissaire ; Désigne la SCP [U] [A] - prise en la personne de Maître [U] [A], [Adresse 3], en qualité de mandataire judiciaire ; Désigne la SELARL Didier Fabrice GUEILHERS

A claim for damages by the applicant in the civil courts was dismissed because there had been no finding of guilt in the criminal proceedings.

The order made by the court responsible for the execution of sentences had not involved any finding of guilt and could not be regarded as having ensued “by virtue of” the criminal conviction simply because

#xa0;   Was the presumption of innocence, guaranteed by Article   6 §   2 of the Convention, respected in the present case, seeing the statements of public officials on Mr Prokopiev’s guilt