CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

47 968 résultats pour « Ducuing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117467

Admin. suprême

18 février 2013

18 février 2013

It is unclear whether the applicant made any submissions during the interrogation.

Source officielle

Page 66 sur 2399

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD004516213

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2018

14 juin 2018

not unusual for the Court to examine a second application concerning a violation of the same right during the subsequent period (see Wasserman v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114053

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2012

26 septembre 2012

Apparently, no lawyer was present during these meetings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD003464517

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2020

16 janvier 2020

    In the specific context of a continuing violation of a Convention right following adoption of a judgment in which the Court found a violation of that right during a certain period, it is

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD000879716

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

It found that during the period under consideration the applicant had spent 629 days in Šiauliai Remand Prison and that during the remaining periods he had been transported outside of that prison.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD001375518

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2023

19 octobre 2023

His wrists were bound with Velcro straps during the journey. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC002738805

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2015

8 décembre 2015

    During the first-instance proceedings the applicant raised no complaints as regards his representation by I.C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0423REP003244896

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1998

23 avril 1998

At night the applicant was kept in an isolation-cell and during the daytime he was interrogated every day.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174258

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2017

18 mai 2017

November 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193944

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2019

23 mai 2019

In 1958 the applicant purchased a plot of land, which had been designated as forest land during a forest cadastral survey (“Orman Kadastrosu”) in 1948, from the Treasury and received its title deed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181011

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2018

23 janvier 2018

June 2007 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186533

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2018

3 septembre 2018

In particular, was the applicant’s right to be defended by a lawyer of his own choice restricted during the proceedings in the first-instance court (see Gafgaz Mammadov v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188229

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2018

14 novembre 2018

    Was the evidence discovered during the search at the applicant’s residence obtained lawfully in terms of domestic law?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164844

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2016

17 juin 2016

During the police intervention and his short-term arrest the applicant suffered injuries necessitating his treatment in hospital.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187656

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2018

15 octobre 2018

The applicant complains that he did not have adequate time or facilities for the preparation of his defence; that he could not have confidential contacts with his counsel during the trial; and that the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5273

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2002

2 juillet 2002

.) - 41556/98 Decision 2.7.2002 [Section IV] Article 9 Article 9-1 Manifest religion or belief Prohibition on nurse wearing Islamic shawl during practical exercises in nursing school: admissible In 1988

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175028

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2017

6 juin 2017

October 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188244

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2018

15 novembre 2018

March 2007 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217013

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2022

25 mars 2022

The applicant, who did not have a driving licence, was driving a car during the night and collided with a person riding a bicycle which was not equipped with any lights or reflectors.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223405

Admin. suprême

7 février 2023

7 février 2023

On 25   July 2019 he was arrested and remanded in custody in relation to the criminal charge of participating, during the demonstration of 20-21   June 2019, in violent activities organised by

Source officielle