39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to give the case priority under Rule 41, Having regard to the decision to grant the applicants anonymity, Having deliberated, decides as follows

    On 23 May 2014 the applicant’s request for an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court was granted and his removal was stayed for the duration of the proceedings before the Court

  The amendment came into force on 1 January 1994 (Prison – Amendment No. 2 – Rules 1993).

  On the same day, 4 April 1986, the Secretary to the Commission, in application of Rule 41 of the Rules of Procedure, informed the Government of the introduction of the application.

On the same day, the President of the Chamber to which the case had been allocated decided, under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court, to indicate to the respondent Government that it was desirable in the

The Government were further requested, under Rule   54   §   2   (a) of the Rules of Court, to submit additional information on the case. 4.

    On 1 November 2004 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section (Rule 52 § 1).

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

The same applies if important new developments have occurred during the proceedings before the Court and where, despite being expressly required to do so by Rule 47 § 7 (former Rule 47 § 6) of the Rules

The process by which the impugned judge had been appointed had amounted to a flagrant breach of the applicable rules at the material time.

4 of the Rules of Court.

  PROCEDURE     On 11 April 2000, the President   requested the Government, pursuant to Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, to suspend the measure of expulsion until the Chamber next met

(Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

("the Rules").

Moreover, the majority of the Supreme Court (four judges) found that the 28-year rule was in compliance with Article 8 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention.

    The Prison Rules 1999 12.

(b)    Interpretation of applicable rules of criminal procedure 27.

    Furthermore, Rule 44C § 1 and Rule 47 § 7 of the Rules of Court read as follows: Rule 44C “1.

Rights and the European Court of Justice…” Standing Order 5B states: “Prison Rule 37A[now Rule 39] … applies to all correspondence between an inmate and his or her legal adviser or a court (including the