CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 442 résultats pour « Putignier »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116DEC003547697

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2000

16 novembre 2000

He also asked the court to release him on bail and submitted that his prolonged detention was putting a severe strain on his family.

Page 65 sur 173

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0116DEC003920598

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2003

16 janvier 2003

From 1975 onwards, one of the firms imported meat, processed it and re-exported it without putting it on the domestic market.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0213DEC003611702

Admin. suprême

13 février 2003

13 février 2003

The main aim of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC002599294

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1995

29 novembre 1995

the Convention about the decision of the Munich Municipality of 8 May 1991, as confirmed by the German courts, imposing obligations upon the applicant organisation to prevent statements denying, or putting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0724JUD001131904

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2008

24 juillet 2008

    As to pecuniary damage, the Court reiterates that the violation found is best redressed by putting the applicant in the position he would have been if the Convention had been respected.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC000446409

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0128DEC001792805

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2010

28 janvier 2010

senior politicians in professional football – Anton Benya, the former president of the Austrian Trade Union Federation and parliamentary speaker, was always a backer of Rapid Vienna – but the method for putting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110603

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2012

9 mars 2012

    The applicant complains that after he lodged his application to the Court in 2007, the authorities of colony no. 6 started persecuting him and putting pressure on him. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD001585907

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

In the present case, the reparation should aim at putting the applicant in the position in which she would have found herself had the violation not occurred, namely prior to the quashing of the judgment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701DEC000370510

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2014

1 juillet 2014

    The Court reiterates that the purpose of the exhaustion rule contained in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115JUD005205315

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2019

15 janvier 2019

    The Court reiterates that the purpose of the exhaustion rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right – usually through the courts – the violations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220JUD005400115

Admin. suprême

20 février 2018

20 février 2018

follows that the applicants provided the national authorities with the opportunity which is in principle intended to be afforded to Contracting States by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, namely of putting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC005981612

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303JUD002106111

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2015

3 mars 2015

, and has concluded on each occasion that the remedies suggested by the Government were ineffective in respect of individuals currently held in detention because they did not offer a possibility of putting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012DEC002048616

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2021

12 octobre 2021

According to the Court’s case-law, where a violation of Article 6 has been found, the reopening of domestic proceedings, if requested, is in principle an appropriate way, and often the most appropriate, of putting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0406JUD001799209

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2021

6 avril 2021

In the present case, the reparation should aim at putting the applicant company in the position in which it would have found itself, had the violation not occurred. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD000798707

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

In these circumstances, the Court considers that an appropriate means for putting an end to the violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention which it has found would be to conclude the criminal proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0621JUD006577411

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2022

21 juin 2022

In principle there can be no “absolute necessity” justifying putting human life at risk, where it is known that the person to be arrested poses no threat to life or limb and is not suspected of having

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC004042598

Admin. suprême

15 juin 1999

15 juin 1999

  By January 1992 the Consortium had acquired 75% of the land covered by the Plan, which was disclosed on all searches made by potential purchasers, thus putting small home-owners such as the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD002362005

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2016

24 novembre 2016

The Court interprets it as an indication that, firstly, the customs authorities acted in an arbitrary manner and, secondly, there were no mechanisms for putting an end to that practice. 20.

Source officielle