In this regard, the applicant states that he does not understand German.

It remains to be determined whether the applicant had at least a   “legitimate expectation” under German law, in particular the Property Act, that the property would be returned to her.

  The applicant complains about German court decisions dismissing his request for access to his daughter, a child born out of wedlock.

    The applicants are German citizens. They live respectively in Oberhausen and Mülheim/Ruhr.

  While the relevant provisions inter alia used general terms, their bearing was clarified by the German courts.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mr H. ‑ J. Behrens and Ms K. Behr, of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. 3.

On 12th November 1945 she acquired German nationality by marriage while retaining her Austrian citizenship.   This Applicant is also represented by Dr. von Beringe, who is her husband.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs   A.   Wittling   Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the German Ministry of Justice. A.

   The applicant complains about the German court decisions to suspend his right of access to Daniela.

  He failed to lodge procedural complaints under S. 344 of the German Code of Criminal Procedure and has to this extent not exhausted the remedies available to him under German law.

The applicant further complained under Article 5 § 2 that he was informed of the extradition request and the charges brought against him solely in German and English although he did not know German.

Two witnesses from the German company stated that they had never sent cheese to the Maltese company while a witness from the German company’s forwarding agents confirmed that the merchandise had consisted

s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communiquée le 4 février 2019   TROISIÈME SECTION Requête n o 6427/12 German

refusal to change applicant’s ethnicity records: communicated The application concerns the domestic authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant’s request to change her ethnicity records from Russian to German

Cité Bordeaux La Cub " qui lui propose une date de rendez-vous pour estimer le bien dont il est propriétaire et pour lequel il a fait valoir son droit à délaissement dans le cadre de la " DUP Faures Gensan

Geslan-Demaret La République mande et ordonne au ministre de l'intérieur en ce qui le concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties

Geslan-Demaret La République mande et ordonne au préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales en ce qui le concerne, et à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis, en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre

That refusal was confirmed by the German courts which had based their decisions on the following grounds.

In the case before the Court, when dismissing the application for refugee status the German authorities had not mentioned the fate of the members of the applicant’s family in Iran or the dangers he would

originated in an application (No. 37928/97) against Germany, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 30 August 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Miro Stambuk, a German