51839/99, §   63, 22 June 2006, and Fressoz and Roire   v.   France [GC], no.   29183/95, §   37, ECHR 1999-I).

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

complained of in the light of the case as a whole and determine whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are “relevant and sufficient” (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

Fressoz and Roire   v. France [GC], no.

However, referring to the case of Fressoz and Roire v. France ([GC], no.

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

national authorities but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

interference in question was “proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued” and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are “relevant and sufficient” (see, inter alia , Fressoz

of public interest, even if shocking and disturbing; however, they should also take into account the protection of the reputation of others, as provided for by Article 10 § 1 of the Convention (see Fressoz

  22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; and Fressoz and Roire v.

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the national authorities but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

Predictably, though, none of the new steps taken by the investigator had led to any fresh leads about the identity of the alleged rapist.

  22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; and Fressoz and Roire v.

    It is not necessary for the Convention right to be explicitly raised in domestic proceedings provided that the complaint is raised “at least in substance” (see Fressoz and Roire v.

information concerning national security, the Court has consistently considered that it had been confronted with an interference with the rights protected by Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Fressoz

xa0;   The applicant alleged, in particular, that his being dismissed from the Prosecutor General’s Office once again after the Court had found a breach of his freedom of expression constituted a fresh

required to use the legal remedies available in domestic law in order to afford the respondent State the possibility of putting right the alleged violation of Article 6 § 2 (see, mutatis   mutandis , Fressoz