CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

47 968 résultats pour « Ducuing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238545

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

Application no. 29952/20 Resül YILDIRIM against Türkiye lodged on 22 June 2020 communicated on 14 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged isolation during

Source officielle

Page 64 sur 2399

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11227

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2016

7 juin 2016

The applicant was also the subject of a disciplinary investigation, and the material gathered during the monitoring of his telephone lines was used for that purpose.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-77550

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2006

19 juillet 2006

detention on remand for psychiatric examinations (83 days) in the framework of private prosecution brought against her following a neighbourhood conflict as well as the restrictions on family visits during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-886

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2010

15 juillet 2010

sat in the Special Sections (special tribunals set up during the German occupation).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-71144

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2005

26 octobre 2005

  Appendix to Resolution ResDH(2005)90   Information provided by the Government of Italy during the examination of the Vaccaro case By the Committee of Ministers   The Government of Italy

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111806

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2012

4 juin 2012

On 5 November 1999 at 6.20 p.m. the applicant was stopped by the police during a routine traffic control.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-128027

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2013

9 octobre 2013

During the applicant’s questioning by the investigator in October 2008, the applicant complained about her ill-treatment by the police on 13 October 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193943

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2019

23 mai 2019

assistance flowing from Law no.353 while the applicant was in custody between 28 March 2003 and 27 June 2003 and the subsequent admission by the trial court into evidence of the statements he had made during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229547

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

The key prosecution witness against the applicant in so far as charges of swindling were concerned, H.Z., had been questioned twice during the pre-trial investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-658

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2011

11 janvier 2011

His name remained on the roll until the middle of October 2001 although he was not provided with any education by the school during this period.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-138855

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2013

8 novembre 2013

During the proceedings the applicant’s detention was extended several times.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214397

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2021

24 novembre 2021

In a short note, the jury explained that their guilty verdict was based on the applicant’s confession during the police interrogation. The applicant received a life sentence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210654

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2021

28 mai 2021

It was not allegedly allowed to visit the chapel during some state holidays. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14215

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

Armenia - 67351/13 Judgment 17.10.2023 [Section IV] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Failure to take measures to protect life of two conscripts killed during compulsory military service

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4482

Admin. suprême

26 février 2004

26 février 2004

Bulgaria - 43577/98 and 43579/98 Judgment 26.2.2004 [Section I] Article 2 Article 2-1 Life Effective investigation Shooting of two Roma fugitives by military police during attempted arrest, and effectiveness

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249944

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2026

31 mars 2026

Türkiye lodged on 28 April 2025 communicated on 31 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s injury resulting from a tear-gas grenade launched by a police officer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216447

Admin. suprême

23 février 2022

23 février 2022

  Romania 04/06/2021 Niculae ALECU 1957 Bucharest Romanian Eleonora ARJOCA, Ionuţ MATEI, Antonie POPESCU The applicant was subjected to violence and injured during the crackdown on anti-government

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169365

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2016

8 novembre 2016

During breaks in hearings he was taken to a cell in the court’s basement which was unventilated and was generally in very bad conditions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003948198

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2005

26 juillet 2005

I. was not heard before the District Court during this session. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0608JUD006001800

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2006

8 juin 2006

appear despite being subpoenaed, the prosecution requested that their statements made during the preliminary investigation be read out before the court.

Source officielle