CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238545
14 novembre 2024
Application no. 29952/20 Resül YILDIRIM against Türkiye lodged on 22 June 2020 communicated on 14 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged isolation during
Page 64 sur 2399
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11227
7 juin 2016
The applicant was also the subject of a disciplinary investigation, and the material gathered during the monitoring of his telephone lines was used for that purpose.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-77550
19 juillet 2006
detention on remand for psychiatric examinations (83 days) in the framework of private prosecution brought against her following a neighbourhood conflict as well as the restrictions on family visits during
ECLI:CEDH:002-886
15 juillet 2010
sat in the Special Sections (special tribunals set up during the German occupation).
ECLI:CEDH:001-71144
26 octobre 2005
Appendix to Resolution ResDH(2005)90 Information provided by the Government of Italy during the examination of the Vaccaro case By the Committee of Ministers The Government of Italy
ECLI:CEDH:001-111806
4 juin 2012
On 5 November 1999 at 6.20 p.m. the applicant was stopped by the police during a routine traffic control.
ECLI:CEDH:001-128027
9 octobre 2013
During the applicant’s questioning by the investigator in October 2008, the applicant complained about her ill-treatment by the police on 13 October 2008.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193943
23 mai 2019
assistance flowing from Law no.353 while the applicant was in custody between 28 March 2003 and 27 June 2003 and the subsequent admission by the trial court into evidence of the statements he had made during
ECLI:CEDH:001-229547
14 novembre 2023
The key prosecution witness against the applicant in so far as charges of swindling were concerned, H.Z., had been questioned twice during the pre-trial investigation.
ECLI:CEDH:002-658
11 janvier 2011
His name remained on the roll until the middle of October 2001 although he was not provided with any education by the school during this period.
ECLI:CEDH:001-138855
8 novembre 2013
During the proceedings the applicant’s detention was extended several times.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214397
24 novembre 2021
In a short note, the jury explained that their guilty verdict was based on the applicant’s confession during the police interrogation. The applicant received a life sentence.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210654
28 mai 2021
It was not allegedly allowed to visit the chapel during some state holidays. 5.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14215
17 octobre 2023
Armenia - 67351/13 Judgment 17.10.2023 [Section IV] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Failure to take measures to protect life of two conscripts killed during compulsory military service
ECLI:CEDH:002-4482
26 février 2004
Bulgaria - 43577/98 and 43579/98 Judgment 26.2.2004 [Section I] Article 2 Article 2-1 Life Effective investigation Shooting of two Roma fugitives by military police during attempted arrest, and effectiveness
ECLI:CEDH:001-249944
31 mars 2026
Türkiye lodged on 28 April 2025 communicated on 31 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s injury resulting from a tear-gas grenade launched by a police officer during
ECLI:CEDH:001-216447
23 février 2022
Romania 04/06/2021 Niculae ALECU 1957 Bucharest Romanian Eleonora ARJOCA, Ionuţ MATEI, Antonie POPESCU The applicant was subjected to violence and injured during the crackdown on anti-government
ECLI:CEDH:001-169365
8 novembre 2016
During breaks in hearings he was taken to a cell in the court’s basement which was unventilated and was generally in very bad conditions.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003948198
26 juillet 2005
I. was not heard before the District Court during this session. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0608JUD006001800
8 juin 2006
appear despite being subpoenaed, the prosecution requested that their statements made during the preliminary investigation be read out before the court.