CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49264

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 1986

16 septembre 1986

Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention;   Whereas in his application introduced on 16 November 1982, the applicant complains that his detention in hospital was unlawful, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228036

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2023

14 septembre 2023

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her home and private life in the present case, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Udovičić v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6462

Admin. suprême

28 août 2012

28 août 2012

his HIV status, and that the Court of Cassation’s argument that his dismissal was justified by the need to maintain a good atmosphere at work could not serve as a basis for differential treatment contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242680

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2025

14 mars 2025

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of the civil proceedings in which he was found

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0505DEC004669216

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2022

5 mai 2022

On 16 September 2021 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had already been compensated by virtue of Law no. 169/2017 for his detention in conditions contrary to Article 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-236129

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2024

3 septembre 2024

The applicant complains of the ineffective investigation into her husband’s death since the perpetrator avoided punishment, which she considers contrary to the requirements of Article 2 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223891

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2023

1 mars 2023

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her rights, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 and/or Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216727

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2022

10 mars 2022

#xa0;   Did the material conditions of the applicant’s detention, in particular the passive smoking that he was exposed to in the cell for two months, amount to inhuman or degrading treatment contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140715

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2014

9 janvier 2014

xa0;     QUESTION TO THE PARTIES       Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and ideas, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172740

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2017

16 mars 2017

    Did the applicant’s dismissal amount to an interference with his right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244941

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Uj v. Hungary , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7030

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2000

6 juin 2000

A further report by five medical experts confirmed the cause of death, but indicated, contrary to the autopsy report, that the haematoma had been in place for at least 10 hours before death.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126712

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2013

6 septembre 2013

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174000

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

    Has the applicant foundation suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of its right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107DEC000470105

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2006

7 novembre 2006

In any event, it noted that the applicant had not claimed that her husband had any proof that she had been unfaithful but that, on the contrary, his suspicions were unfounded.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1017DEC003049596

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2000

17 octobre 2000

In this respect, the applicants allege that that difference constitutes unlawful discrimination, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1017DEC003676097

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2000

17 octobre 2000

In this respect, the applicants allege that that difference constitutes unlawful discrimination, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68323-68791

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2000

13 juin 2000

to Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the right to liberty and security of person contrary to Article 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC006341300

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2002

12 décembre 2002

On 1 April 1993 the District Authority dismissed the applicant’s request for a building permit on the ground that the project would have been contrary to the objectives of the building prohibition, that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0411DEC002807195

Admin. suprême

11 avril 1996

11 avril 1996

  THE LAW         The applicant complains that upon return to Serbia he will be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention which reads: &

Source officielle

Page 64 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →