the United Kingdom , judgment of 27   March 1996, Reports 1996 ‑ II, p. 500, § 39, and Fressoz and Roire v.   France [GC], no.

national authorities but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, inter alia , Fressoz

interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith and on an accurate factual basis and provide reliable and precise information in accordance with the ethics of journalism (see Fressoz

review proceedings, the Supreme Court of Russia quashed the judgment of 17 April 2000 and the decisions of 30   June 2000 and 30 May 2001, and sent the case back to the first-instance court for fresh

national authorities but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

subsequently in Strasbourg should have been raised, “at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law”, before the national authorities (see Fressoz

supervisory jurisdiction, is not to take the place of the competent national authorities, but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have delivered pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

  22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; and Fressoz and Roire v.

Similarly, that interest will weigh heavily in the balance in determining, as must be done under paragraph 2 of Article 10, whether the restriction was proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Fressoz

the light of the case as a whole and, in particular, to determine whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are relevant and sufficient (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

supervision is not to take the place of national authorities but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

responsible State, using judicial resources that may be considered effective and sufficient by national legislation, the ability to remedy the alleged violations by domestic means (see, inter alia, Fressoz

Spain , 23   April 1992, § 27, Series A no. 236, and Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no.   29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I).

national authorities but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

cases, such as the present one, concerning the written media, the national margin of appreciation is circumscribed by the interests of a democratic society in ensuring and maintaining a free press (see Fressoz

subsequently at the international level should have been aired before those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Fressoz

  the United Kingdom , 27   March 1996, §   39, Reports 1996-II; Fressoz and Roire v.   France [GC], no.   29183/95, §   54, ECHR 1999-I; Pedersen and Baadsgaard v.