CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 262 résultats pour « Volfinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD001887791

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 1996

15 novembre 1996

through false information or defamatory declarations about an electoral candidate, or by any other means, either in order to prevent him from exercing his right to vote or in order to influence his voting

Page 63 sur 64

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD004216806

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2017

3 octobre 2017

Vladimir Putin left the Chechens no choice, but you have a choice and you may still choose peace by voting against Putin in March 2004. Both for you and for us this is a real opportunity.” 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0224JUD003390804

Admin. suprême

24 février 2011

24 février 2011

provides that parties and joined parties are entitled to comment on a constitutional appeal, to make submissions to the Constitutional Court, to consult a case file (with the exception of records of voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201DEC001227704

Admin. suprême

1 février 2007

1 février 2007

In his reasoning, approved in the main by the other four Justices sitting in the case, the first voting judge, Mr Justice Oftedal Broch, stated: “(20) In the current proceedings, it is of key importance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD000838408

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

    The Court further notes that because of the refusal to undergo a strip search the applicant was unable to exercise his voting right in the elections to the European Parliament on 7 June 2009

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118JUD000000708

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2008

18 novembre 2008

    It is not so much changing voting systems which is a bad thing – they can always be changed for the better – as changing them frequently or just before (within one year of) elections.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1026JUD003098596

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2000

26 octobre 2000

The minutes of the conference establish that it was attended by 1,553 persons, of whom 1,188 were official delegates with voting rights.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD003859010

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

In view of the outcome of the voting on this claim we see no reason to consider the claim for compensation.” II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0611JUD007756801

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2009

11 juin 2009

This applies in particular to the election results: individual citizens may challenge them on the grounds of irregularities in the voting procedures.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC003819097

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2002

27 juin 2002

who are independent of the Government, the employers’ or employees’ organisations and two experts representing respectively employers’ and employees’ interests, who, unlike the other members, have no voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD003279802

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2011

26 juillet 2011

    Voting in referendum 80.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701REP002518694

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1997

1 juillet 1997

present era, especially when contrasted with the current position in other Member States of the Council of Europe, and that it might be seen as inconsistent to have an age of majority applicable to voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-7306062-9963179

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2022

8 avril 2022

The Government saw this strategy, aimed at reaching as broad a political consensus as possible, as a means of avoiding “another failure in the voting” in the Seimas . 46 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0410JUD003973198

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2003

10 avril 2003

pecuniary damage caused by the fact that he had lost his case against the National Bank before the Supreme Court on 25 April 1997, which by three votes to two, with Mrs   Justice Guðrún Erlendsdóttir voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0521JUD005830210

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2019

21 mai 2019

P. and H. were also present at the plenary session of 12   October 2010 and there was no indication that they abstained from voting.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1204DEC007756801

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2007

4 décembre 2007

This applies in particular to the election results: individual citizens may challenge them on the grounds of irregularities in the voting procedures.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD001226607

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2012

12 janvier 2012

Such effects should be seen in the context of the existing situation where the ownership or holding of shares and the attached entitlement to exercise voting rights was controversial, or, rather, where

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD003363106

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

same place from which their mother comes, exclusively for the purposes of any state aid or other benefit which is provided for displaced persons, without their place of origin being connected with any voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD003549313

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2016

8 novembre 2016

    It is true that the applicant was not prevented from expressing his views on the bill in the eventual voting process.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD001909020

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2022

1 mars 2022

Regulation 108* “(1) The decisions of the Board shall be taken by a majority of the members present and voting.

Source officielle