CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Pôle 6 - Chambre 6
686f4c97d3976f57d00d3176
9 juillet 2025
° Portalis 35L7-V-B7G-CE6PG Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 02 Décembre 2021 -Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de MEAUX - RG n° 20/00312 APPELANT Monsieur [A] [W] [Adresse
Page 63 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0715JUD000264106
15 juillet 2014
She indicated in the claim the applicant’s “permanent address” as the address where he could be reached. 10.
cr
613725fbcd58014677422065
15 novembre 2000
été remis à l'acquéreur ; qu'il est apparu, en outre, que le certificat d'immatriculation du véhicule avait été précédemment établi au nom de la société Prestige Import, société ayant son siège à l'adresse
6137260bcd5801467742283c
9 février 2000
menaces mortifères précises et fréquentes contre leur mère et contre elles-mêmes si elles persistaient à vouloir vivre auprès d'elle ; que le praticien concluait que les entretiens avaient eu pour mérite
1ère Chambre
69f43c8acdc6046d472ddf76
30 avril 2026
RAPPPEL DES FAITS ET DE LA PROCEDURE La société dénommée SARL [Adresse 1], projetant de réaliser un programme de construction d'un ensemble immobilier constitué de 2 bâtiments comprenant 26 loge
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309DEC007277601
9 mars 2006
The court could examine the case on the merits, was not bound by the scope and grounds of the request for supervisory review and was obliged to conduct a full review of the evidence.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC002046204
25 avril 2017
The Court considers that it is not necessary to address all the Government’s objections since the complaint is in any event inadmissible for the following reasons. 26.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204266
7 juillet 2020
In particular, the Government, having described the necessary treatment as merely stone removal surgery via ERCP and EPST, had stated that such treatment was readily available to the applicant in Armenia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD003179610
9 janvier 2018
30 December 2009 that there were no legal grounds for allowing the challenge ... in particular because the hearing did not touch upon the defendant’s guilt; it was not an examination of the merits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0609JUD002323894
9 juin 1997
The Court heard addresses by Mr Geus, Mr Bitsaxis and Mr Kyriazopoulos, and also their replies to its questions. 6.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0407JUD004403117
7 avril 2026
The applicant appealed, arguing that the first-instance court had failed to address her reasoning or assess her situation, and had referred to arguments unrelated to her application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC005239099
1 février 2005
It follows that this issue should be joined to the merits of the case. B. Merits 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330JUD005950200
30 mars 2006
Consequently, the Court cannot consider the merits of the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD002264719
3 février 2022
Merits The parties’ submissions (a) The applicant 36. The applicant complained that the length of his detention on remand had been unreasonable. 37.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0210DEC000230064
10 février 1967
He then asked for special permission to send a letter in reply to his daughter under the address of his wife. As a result, the prison authorities withdrew, on ..
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210DEC004215210
10 décembre 2019
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the refusal of the domestic courts to consider her claim on the merits on the ground that the Street Committee lacked
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004DEC001282202
4 octobre 2005
The applicant’s lawyer denied his client’s involvement with the PKK and contended that these allegations were merely based on his statements taken under duress.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD004214917
25 novembre 2021
Merits The parties’ submissions 20. The applicant pointed out that in its decision no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC004474608
24 janvier 2012
In view of these elements, the Court accepts that Law no. 87 was designed, in principle, to address the issue of delayed enforcement of judgments in an effective and meaningful manner, taking
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD004171313
28 mars 2024
In particular, it touched upon the private life of people who were merely candidates for elected positions and not yet members of parliament.