During this meeting, the applicant, who tested positive in a toxicology test, confessed to having possessed drugs but only for personal consumption.

During the firing, Fadime Bingöl and Sezgin Engin were killed and a number of others were injured. 22.

  She received the injuries partly during a period of a few weeks prior to 14 August 1985, partly during the leaves from hospital referred to above and partly during a period of not quite three weeks

Moreover [her] mental state received consideration during the hearing.

He stated that the investigator and three to four police officers had been present during the search and that the applicant had not shown any resistance during the arrest or search and had followed the

    According to the fourth applicant, during the 14 May 2012 demonstration a police officer hit her from behind and pushed her aside.

that during criminal investigations: ...

of complaints concerning alleged irregularities during the electoral campaign.

Furthermore, the applicant gave testimony during his trial and confirmed his statement to the police. Moreover, the applicant had not admitted to any wrongdoing during the interrogation. 35.

    On 14 July 2009 the first applicant initiated proceedings against the Călăraşi DGASPC, seeking a court order for: overtime pay for work done during weekdays; overtime pay for work done during

    On 18 April 2008 during the applicant’s trial, the court heard Sh. as a witness.

Those reports referred to severe physical ill-treatment at the time of apprehension, during transportation and/or during subsequent police custody.

    On 21 May 2013 during the final vote on Bill no.

    On 25   November 2003, during the course of the trial, the applicants complained to the court that during their unrecorded detention (between 25   and 30 September in respect of

During his examination as an accused on the same day he pleaded not guilty and refused to testify, citing his right not to incriminate himself. 29.

The applicants complained that the authorities had failed in their obligations to protect them from racist threats during the demonstration and to conduct an effective investigation into the incident in

The applicant’s husband did not accompany her during the transfer. Relying on M.N. and I.A.’s oral evidence, the court found that they had not used any force against the applicant.

During the same evening the prosecutor forwarded a proposal for the applicant’s placement in pre-trial detention for twenty-nine days to the Timișoara Court of Appeal. 6.

On numerous occasions during the hearings, the applicant requested that a re-enactment of the scene be held in his presence, but his requests were dismissed.