witnesses and counterbalancing measures taken in the absence of such examination were both addressed by the Supreme Court (see paragraph 29 above) (see, among many other authorities and mutatis mutandis , Fressoz

have been raised “at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law” before the national authorities (see , among many other authorities, Fressoz

authorities, but rather to review under Article   10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their discretionary powers (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their margin of appreciation (see Fressoz

  22978/05 , §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; and Fressoz and Roire v.   France   [GC], no.

protection afforded by Article 10 to journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with responsible journalism (see Fressoz

level should have been aired before those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz

its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts, but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

of public interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the ethics of journalism (see, for example, Fressoz

figure to observe laws and regulations aimed at protecting serious public interests, even in the private sphere, may in certain circumstances constitute a matter of legitimate public interest” (see Fressoz

its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts, but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III, and Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I). 22.

issues of general interest provided that they are acting in good faith and on an accurate factual basis and provide “reliable and precise” information in accordance with the ethics of journalism (see Fressoz

subsequently in Strasbourg should have been raised, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law, before the national authorities ( Fressoz

have an effect on the outcome of the trial; ... ” Article 504 “Anyone who has been finally convicted is entitled to compensation from the State for any loss or damage suffered where it is held in a fresh

exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the competent domestic courts but rather to review under Article 10 the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz

France , 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no.   29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999 ‑ I; and Elçi and Others v. Turkey , nos.

    However, on the same day the investigating judge issued a fresh search warrant with instructions to “search for and seize all objects, documents, effects and/or other items that might assist

to take the place of the national authorities but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see Fressoz