CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 262 résultats pour « Volfinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0626JUD001274787

Admin. suprême

26 juin 1992

26 juin 1992

They carry out investigations into crimes which have been committed, supervise the enforcement of court judgments pronounced in Andorra, and sit on the Tribunal de Corts as non-voting assessors (see paragraph

Page 62 sur 64

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420JUD005675113

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2021

20 avril 2021

It was unable to reach a majority decision, with an equal number of justices voting for and against declaring paragraph 3 unconstitutional.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917DEC002929522

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2024

17 septembre 2024

The internal function included the right to come to Estonia and exercise the rights of an Estonian citizen, such as voting and being elected.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108JUD006395019

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2022

8 novembre 2022

short note ( Niederschrift ) the considerations on the basis of which the jurors have answered the questions put to them is detailed in Article 331 § 3 of the CCP, and reads as follows: “(3) After the voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304DEC003723597

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2003

4 mars 2003

It went on to say that Mr Bompressi’s submissions were in any event manifestly unfounded, as an impugned decision could only be declared null and void as a result of the voting procedure at private deliberations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0308REP001275087

Admin. suprême

8 mars 1990

8 mars 1990

  It also stated that the legislative authorities are not prevented from redetermining civil rights by voting new civil laws, provided the principle of equality is not violated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709DEC002171422

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2024

9 juillet 2024

As to the request by the second applicant’s attorney to read out the transcript of the deliberations of the trial court, the Supreme Court noted that information regarding judges’ deliberations and voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224243

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2023

30 mars 2023

with 7   sleeping places Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   31741/19* 04/06/2019 Sergey Gennadyevich VOLGIN

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1207DEC001275087

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 1988

7 décembre 1988

  It also stated that the legislative authorities are not prevented from re-adjusting civil rights by voting new civil laws, provided the principle of equality is not violated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1209DEC001094284

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 1987

9 décembre 1987

  As such, the KBW recognised the legitimacy of the use of armed force in achieving its goals, which included "accountability and the possibility of voting representatives of the people out of office

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531DEC002682806

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2007

31 mai 2007

A proposal is passed in a referendum if a majority of those voting have cast votes in favour of the same.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206496

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2020

12 novembre 2020

Section 86 § 4 provides that, if the CC finds the draft amendments to be in compliance with the Constitution, the voting on the issue at the forthcoming regular sittings of the National Assembly shall

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0211JUD003496497

Admin. suprême

11 février 2003

11 février 2003

    The first voting judge, Mrs Justice Gjølstad, stated on behalf of a unanimous court, inter alia : “In so far as the appeal concerns the merits, two general questions arise, namely the relationship

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0422JUD005985700

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2008

22 avril 2008

The State Treasury had possessed shares in the company, but as it was a minority shareholder, even its indirect influence on the company’s organs, through the normal voting mechanisms applicable to public

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0302JUD000926781

Admin. suprême

2 mars 1987

2 mars 1987

;  Nothing prevents French-speaking candidates - whether resident in Halle-Vilvoorde or not - from standing for election in that district, or the voters - whether French-speaking or not - from voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD003787114

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

Section 46/E “(1) The requirements laid down in Article 26(1) of the Fundamental Law shall also apply to members of the Clemency Board. (2) The Clemency Board shall take its decisions by majority voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

In view of the outcome of the voting on this claim we see no reason to consider the claim for compensation.” 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003688205

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2010

9 mars 2010

While Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) ([GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005 ‑ IX) found that a blanket ban on voting was disproportionate, it accepted that it was open to the legislative to tailor

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD002014023

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

has committed a fundamental disciplinary violation; (5) has not, without a good reason, participated in the sessions of the SJC at least twice within a year; (6) has refused to vote or abstained from voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC000859404

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2008

2 septembre 2008

Although there were reports of violence, intimidation and voting irregularities, the EU Election Observation Mission acknowledged that the result overall reasonably reflected the opinion of the people.

Source officielle