CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD004259713
18 juillet 2017
54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.
Page 62 sur 2215
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0724JUD002183414
24 juillet 2018
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD002910503
20 juillet 2010
He accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0428JUD001121902
28 avril 2009
They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD004128113
5 juin 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD005561717
2 mars 2023
62 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229JUD003719597
29 février 2000
It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC004593606
26 février 2008
39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant the applicant anonymity under Rule 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0125JUD003401507
25 janvier 2018
He accordingly requested a revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111807
6 juin 2012
On 22 February 2012 the applicants requested the Court to apply Rules 39-41.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1653
24 février 2009
In March 2007 thePresident of the Second Section of the Court decided to inform the Italian Government, by virtue of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, that in the interest of the parties and of the proper
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD001791108
6 avril 2010
Takes formal note of the agreement between the parties and the arrangements made to ensure compliance with the undertakings given therein (Rule 43 § 3 of the Rules of Court); 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0706DEC002061692
6 juillet 1993
On 11 September 1992 the Commission rejected the applicants' request for the application of Rule 36 of its Rules of Procedure but decided, pursuant to Rule 48 para
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1012JUD001189285
12 octobre 1992
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0306JUD002985196
6 mars 2001
The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1204JUD001715690
4 décembre 1995
of the proceedings (Rules 39 para. 1 and 40).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129DEC006215410
29 janvier 2013
The asylum proceedings and application of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1113DEC001329387
13 novembre 1987
36 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, on behalf of S. and N.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001149185
19 février 1991
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1004DEC001392688
4 octobre 1990
But not every rule is a necessary element of Article 6 (Art. 6).