Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175020
7 juin 2017
7 juin 2017
publication of the applicant’s personal details and the circumstances of the investigation against him in the media, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9716
22 septembre 1993
22 septembre 1993
Any other reading of Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 would be likely to produce - as regards one of the conditions to be satisfied when applying to the Commission itself - results contrary to the letter
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212596
22 septembre 2021
22 septembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see V.A.M. v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179361
14 novembre 2017
14 novembre 2017
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his right to protection of property, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172645
10 mars 2017
10 mars 2017
He alleges that such a requirement had no basis in the domestic law; it was arbitrary and contrary to medical opinion and the applicant’s personal choice.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-8984
1 juillet 1997
1 juillet 1997
disqualifying conditions relating to when position was held, and duration and extent of duties, had been met in case of each of applicants - Court could not reach any other conclusion - annulments not contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3825
30 juin 2005
30 juin 2005
He contended that the leaders and members of the party were advocating or actively promoting certain practices, in particular the wearing of the Islamic headscarf, which were contrary to the principle
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235928
30 août 2024
30 août 2024
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possession because of the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour, contrary to the requirements of Article
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9714
22 septembre 1993
22 septembre 1993
Any other reading of Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 would be likely to produce - as regards one of the conditions to be satisfied when applying to the Commission itself - results contrary to the letter
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214565
1 décembre 2021
1 décembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 (see for example Biao v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196365
6 septembre 2019
6 septembre 2019
Was the applicant’s dismissal in violation of his freedom of expression and thus contrary to Article 10 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205031
7 septembre 2020
7 septembre 2020
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his rights under Article 8 of the Convention, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233061
14 mars 2024
14 mars 2024
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the domestic authorities’ refusal to allow them
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217833
18 mai 2022
18 mai 2022
Has the applicant association suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of its Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 11 ( Berkman v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202976
11 mai 2020
11 mai 2020
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court, contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2044
3 juin 2008
3 juin 2008
the applicant’s appeal against that decision, a lawyer acting for the Cabinet of Ministers explained that the reason for the refusal was that the applicant had made statements to the media that were contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198431
14 octobre 2019
14 octobre 2019
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208498
8 février 2021
8 février 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201298
20 janvier 2020
20 janvier 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? In particular: 1.1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113DEC002553012
13 novembre 2014
13 novembre 2014
THE LAW In the absence of any indication to the contrary, the Court is satisfied that the applicant does not intend to pursue his application and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of
Source officiellePage 62 sur 1005
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude
Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif — Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif ; mandataire liquidateur : Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36, rue des Jardins, 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin
23/02/2012
Voir →
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain
Dépôt de l'état des créances Loi de 1985 — Avis de dépôt de l'état des créances, dépôt de l'état des créances au Tribunal de Grande Instance de Metz où les réclamations seront recevables dans un délai de quinze jours à compter de la présente publication
04/08/2008
Voir →
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude
Jugement d'ouverture de liquidation judiciaire — Jugement prononçant la liquidation judiciaire ; insolvabilité notoire fixée au 24 octobre 2005 ; mandataire judiciaire à la liquidation : La SELARL ETUDE GANGLOFF & NARDI prise en la personne de Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36 rue des Jardins 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin
22/05/2008
Voir →