Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113326
9 juin 2011
9 juin 2011
On 9 July 2010 the applicants’ counsel was informed that the registration of the first applicant’s paternity was not possible since the child was deceased. B.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244134
11 juin 2025
11 juin 2025
The children’s judge considered that an investigation was needed into the family situation of the child. In foster care the applicant’s son showed delayed development.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233349
28 mars 2024
28 mars 2024
The child had just turned two years old when the father lost almost all contact with her in 2020, despite holding joint custody over the child with her mother at the time.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223423
6 février 2023
6 février 2023
37Em/3/2017 for the enforcement of a judicial ruling concerning the applicant’s contact rights with regard to his child, as amended by two urgent interim measures ( neodkladné opatrenie ) issued
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6859
9 juin 1998
9 juin 1998
Legitimate aim Provisions concerned had been applied in order to protect child – no reason to consider that domestic courts had relied on them with aim of estranging S. from her original family
Source officielle3ème chambre
DTA_2300811_20260306
6 mars 2026
6 mars 2026
prononcer la réduction de la cotisation de taxe foncière sur les propriétés bâties à laquelle il a été assujetti au titre de l’année 2021, à raison du bien dont il est propriétaire au 176 route de Chailly
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0927DEC003679797
27 septembre 2001
27 septembre 2001
If the parents of the child are married, the child obtains the family name (Section 270 § 1 CC).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1125DEC002366002
25 novembre 2004
25 novembre 2004
interests ( zwaarwegende belangen ) of the child.”
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0621JUD007049113
21 juin 2022
21 juin 2022
child.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213DEC005778917
13 février 2018
13 février 2018
In the context of promotion and protection proceedings, the court may place a child into care with a view to future adoption if the emotional ties characteristic of a parent-child relationship do not exist
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1209DEC002611102
9 décembre 2004
9 décembre 2004
On 4 July 1967 X gave birth to a child, Y.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179676
1 décembre 2017
1 décembre 2017
a notary his wish that the child be registered bearing her mother’s family name.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC002194903
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
and, during dinner, had not spoken for three quarters of an hour with the child.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002652195
27 novembre 1996
27 novembre 1996
The Child Support Agency ("CSA") assessed the applicant's liability to pay child support under the Child Support Act 1991 ("the 1991 Act") as £127.13 per week from 4 October
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0407DEC002465721
7 avril 2026
7 avril 2026
In respect of the applicant, the child welfare services noted that the parents together had not taken any steps to prepare for the arrival of a child, the applicant had a criminal history, an unstable
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC001826291
30 juin 1993
30 juin 1993
In August 1980 the child was taken into public care according to the provisions of the 1960 Child Care Act (barnavårdslagen) as the parents were found to be overprotective vis à vis the child, thereby
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD003382907
5 avril 2011
5 avril 2011
The child obviously had a stronger attachment to his father.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD004364310
11 décembre 2014
11 décembre 2014
These concepts also include a mother’s right to decide which medical treatment her child should receive and, accordingly, whether the child should be admitted to hospital (see Glass v. the United Kingdom
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0916JUD002956995
16 septembre 1999
16 septembre 1999
the child and her mother with a view to returning custody to the mother.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216149
7 février 2022
7 février 2022
the return of his minor son to the place of his habitual residence in Italy following his unlawful retention in Russia by his mother, under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child
Source officiellePage 62 sur 385