CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 305 résultats pour « Buffin »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016JUD004974711

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

The flight of many Uzbek business people and the seizure of Uzbek ‑ owned businesses have sharply diminished the minority’s once important role in the economy.

Page 62 sur 66

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD003097996

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2000

27 juin 2000

The information provided for that purpose was related both to the local economic context and to the administrative formalities foreign businesses were required to complete, and the fee charged for this

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001668290

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

    Some of the applicants submitted that, contrary to the applicant in the Loizidou case, they had had their home and businesses in northern Cyprus.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1010DEC001221386

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 1988

10 octobre 1988

Administrative Board, the municipality of Malmö found that there was no reason why the licences should not be granted, while MTEA submitted inter alia that there was an over-establishment of taxi businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224DEC001991892

Admin. suprême

24 février 1997

24 février 1997

  This Act provides, in principle, for the return of confiscated property, including businesses, where this is still possible and does not violate user rights acquired in good faith.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0319JUD001835791

Admin. suprême

19 mars 1997

19 mars 1997

within the territory of another member State, prohibiting all discrimination on the ground of nationality as regards the right to take up activities as self-employed persons and to set up and run businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0605JUD006375800

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2007

5 juin 2007

the foregoing, it cannot be said that the decision to open fire was taken, or that the execution of that decision by the soldiers had been carried out in the heat of the moment (see, a contrario , Bubbins

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0918REP002288093

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 1997

18 septembre 1997

   Her husband was a partner in and assistant general manager in two businesses (Aytekin Contractors and Trade Limited Company and Architectural Industry Limited Company) at Diyarbakir.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1029REP002483394

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 1997

29 octobre 1997

access to the European market), on deposit guarantee schemes (which increase investor confidence in credit institutions authorised in Gibraltar), on data protection, on recreational craft (two new businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC003450697

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

persons in the Edirne area in 1995, including Düzgün Tekin, [4] whose body had been buried on a rubbish dump near Çadırkent (place near Edirne) and that he had participated in extorting money from businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004430698

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

It did not prevent them from obtaining individual permission from businesses within the Galleries (the manager of a hypermarket granted permission for a stand within his store on one occasion) or from

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1127DEC006290200

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2003

27 novembre 2003

Since then the applicants have alleged that the stigma attaching to their reputation has led to other businesses refusing to trade with them e.g. providing two letters referring to the appearance of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0721JUD006933201

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2005

21 juillet 2005

The witnesses testified about their knowledge of the applicant's income, businesses and possessions, and about their observations of the applicant before, during and after the criminal proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD003450697

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2005

17 mars 2005

persons in the Edirne area in 1995, including Düzgün Tekin [4] , whose body had been buried on a rubbish dump near Çadırkent (place near Edirne) and that he had participated in extorting money from businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1114DEC006674601

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2002

14 novembre 2002

different problem, namely, the inequality of bargaining power between the mobile home owner and the site owner, in which area there was a deficiency of supply over demand that the private sites, run as businesses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0304DEC001904891

Admin. suprême

4 mars 1996

4 mars 1996

  This Act provides, in principle, for the return of confiscated property, including businesses, where this is still possible and does not violate user rights acquired in good faith.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610JUD006310600

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2010

10 juin 2010

and effective investigation, but in addition requires that compensation for the non ‑ pecuniary damage flowing from the breach be, in principle, available as part of the range of redress (see Bubbins

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD006064208

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2014

16 juillet 2014

Section 22(b) “Ljubljanska Banka Ljubljana and Kreditna Banka Maribor shall transfer their respective businesses and assets to the new banks created hereunder.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0205DEC003165108

Admin. suprême

5 février 2019

5 février 2019

I SA/Wr 2241/97)), and in a series of cases concerning undisputedly fraudulent businesses concluding tax transactions under the law applicable prior to Poland’s accession to the European Union (judgments

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD001126404

Admin. suprême

4 février 2020

4 février 2020

which may be rendered by “other people” such as in-house counsel, partners or employees of law firms or other organisations giving legal advice, or independent legal advisers registered as individual businesses

Source officielle