Given that the court is not entitled to declare inadmissible of its own motion an application for enforcement based on a final court judgment ... simply because [the judgment sought to be enforced] has

(h)     The authorisation for a childminder in Blagnac to mind a child in her care had been withdrawn because she was a Jehovah’s Witness.

Those authorities refused the request for family reunification because the applicant could not comply with the maintenance requirement and because it had not been lodged within three months after the applicant

It is obvious that in the present case this argument cannot apply because this is not a case where the applicant declined to give evidence because of his concern about self-incrimination.

A..., représenté par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : - d’annnuler la décision du préfet du Rhône du 24 septembre 2024 portant rejet de sa demande de rendez-vous en vue du dépôt de sa demande de titre

Thiriez pour avocat à la Cour de cassation, la société 2M et associés, prise en la personne de Mme [O] [R], commissaire à l'exécution du plan de la société La Nouvelle, venant aux droits de la société Because

On 2 October 1999, the first applicant was released from prison because the investigation had come to an end and because the detention period set by the General Prosecutor’s Office had expired.

The Society told the applicant it could not grant his request because the report was a confidential document prepared for the exclusive attention of the Court of Appeal.

A claim for damages by the applicant in the civil courts was dismissed because of a lack of firm evidence that her patient records had been unlawfully consulted.

On 28 April 2004 the enforcement proceedings were terminated because of the debtor's lack of funds and because the property of the Armed Forces could not be used to enforce a court decision.

The Court considered that there had been no uncertainty as to the nature of the land or its possible use because the applicant company had known since 4 March 1966 that it was subject to the general development

The applicant received a fine of approximately 240 euros, but as he did not pay it he was summoned to the courts, where he pleaded that the fine imposed on him was discriminatory because it subjected him

The applicant appealed and on 20 August 2002 the Appeal Tribunal decided that the appeal could not succeed because the applicant was not a woman.

He also complained that the Supreme Court had not been impartial because the president of that court, who allegedly had been involved in the events but had not been prosecuted, had testified against him

In parallel civil proceedings brought by other trade unions the Annex was declared null and void in 2008 because it had not been entered into by all the trade unions that had concluded the main agreement

He also claims that there has been a further breach of Article 8 of the Convention because he could not visit his family.

Russia - 29582/09 Judgment 7.12.2021 [Section III] Article 11 Article 11-1 Form and join trade unions Trade-union federation ordered to expel a grassroots union of working prisoners because of a statutory

adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence as required by Article 6, paragraph 3 (b) (art. 6-3-b) of the Convention and, in particular, whether there was a violation of that provision because

He went to live in a camper van, but had to be hospitalised, his health having deteriorated because of the unsuitable character of such accommodation.

New delays in the execution of the judgment arose because the public body responsible for paying compensation had not been unequivocally identified.