He can therefore not claim to have been directly affected by the excessive length of the proceedings. The Court concludes that he cannot claim to be a victim of the alleged violation. 54.

However, this cannot justify the whole length of the proceedings. 45.     There is nothing to indicate that the applicant’s conduct contributed to the length of the proceedings.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

    It can be seen from the bailiff’s report of 22 January 2003 that between 7.45 and 9.35 a.m. on that day he visited the addresses for Mr   O. and Mr I. provided during the preliminary

The opposing party can, within thirty days of the service of the appeal on points of law, submit a reply to the appeal on points of law to the [same] court. ...

While these factors seem to militate against finding Article 7 of the Convention applicable, the Court cannot regard them as decisive.

    The applicant further relied on the above-mentioned case of Ian   Peter Ellis pro et noe , where the Constitutional Court had reduced the award from EUR 50,000 to 15,000; Alessandra

The interference cannot, therefore, be equated to a deprivation of possessions within the meaning of the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

It follows that the fact that [the applicant] suffers from a number of illnesses cannot be taken as an absolute ground calling for a change of the preventive measure to a more lenient one.

I cannot remember the side. From [his] words I learned that during his detention [the applicant] had been severely beaten, as a result of which they broke his rib and contused the kidneys.

Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 6   September 2016 as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Ledi Bianku,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Ledi Bianku,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,  

The Court considers that the interference in question can be seen as having pursued the legitimate aim of the protection of the rights of others. 40.

Therefore, taking into account the aforementioned criteria, [it can be concluded that] the temporary (for the period of imprisonment) restriction of the electoral rights established in the legislation

Accordingly, that complaint cannot be dismissed for failure to exhaust domestic remedies. (b)     Compliance with the six-month rule 28.

Section 32 “(1) A court at the next level of jurisdiction can assign a case to another court which is competent ratione materiae from its region if that court can conduct the proceedings more conveniently

    Article 478.3 § 5 provides that the person can be detained for the purpose of his or her extradition for a period of two months.

For the same reasons as those given above, the [appellants’] argument that their right of access to a court was only nominally respected cannot prosper.

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,   Ksenija Turković,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,