The Court notes that the applicant is the majority shareholder of company “C” with 90,62% shares and that he was removed from the management of the company in the course of the insolvency

She now alleged that the State had taken away the property from her father by “nationalisation which had taken place in violation of the then ‑ applicable legal rules” within the meaning of Section

She received what she described as a “terrible blow in the right leg beneath the tibia”. She realised she had been hit with a sharp object, namely a bayonet wielded by a Turkish soldier.

He further alleged that while in Jilava Prison Hospital he had been obliged to share a bed with an Aids patient and had suffered psychological torture.

The company operated under a sales distribution agreement with Norwegian Shell Ltd.

  1)   The Court accepted, first of all, that the applicants owned “possessions” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. These submissions were supplemented on 7   October 2011. 4.

    On 28   March 2001 she lodged a claim with the Mlyniv Court against a collective enterprise N. and the Mlyniv State Administration seeking recovery of her share in N.

In 1971 an individual further donated his share of a plot in the same village to the applicant. 6.

    In 2002 the applicant bought seventy percent of the shares in Sedmi Juli ‑ Mala Plana , which had been a socially owned company.

document of the company in Kosovo, presented to the domestic authorities and the Court, indicates that the applicant is registered as its co-owner with limited liability, and that he owns 49% of the share

The applicant argued that she was not employed and that her only means were payments for her share in marital property received from her husband.

    Following the annulment of the debtor’s privatisation the State owned 58.18% of shares in the company. 17.

As for the information she had disseminated about the applicant (see paragraphs 3 and 4 above), she could not recall the exact source from which she had learned of the alleged facts concerning the applicant

  Despite that, the applicants were placed in ordinary cell blocks, where they had to share a cell with up to 20 other prisoners and share communal facilities with an even larger number of prisoners

    Under Article 41 of the Convention the applicant sought just satisfaction of 128,550.75 euros (EUR), which was the amount of the share in his mother’s estate that he would have inherited

    Did the alleged acts which gave rise to the applicants’ complaints have a basis in “law” within the meaning of the Convention provisions relied on by them? 4.

       It follows that this aspect of the application is manifestly ill- founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.   2.

According to the Court's case-law, a public law institution founded by the legislature is not an association within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Köll v.