54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

  54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

  54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

  54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

  54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

The Government accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

62 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 7.

See paragraph 8 of the document in this link http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/pdf/uksi_20101921_en.pdf   The amendment to the Rule has been disseminated to court staff in England and Wales through

On 25 September 2009, the President of the Chamber to which the application was allocated decided to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and indicate to the Government of the United Kingdom that the applicant

    Rule 39 request In the meantime, on 24 February 2016 the applicant asked the Court to apply interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.

They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

  From the outset the applicant requested the Commission to intervene under Rule 36 of the Rules of Procedure to stay her removal to Ghana pending its examination of her Article 8/family life claim

The President of the Fifth Section decided that the applicant’s identity should not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

  54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

The President of the Section acceded to the applicant’s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). 2.     The applicant was represented by Mr D.A.

    On 16 September 2014 the Court considered the possibility of revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court and decided to give the Government three weeks in

       On 14 October 1994 the Commission decided not to indicate to the Government of San Marino, pursuant to Rule 36 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, the measure suggested

The President of the Section acceded to the applicant’s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). 2.     The applicant was represented by Mr D.A.

  54 §   3 of the Rules of Court.