AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1959:0902DEC000034357
2 septembre 1959
2 septembre 1959
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0503DEC001030883
3 mai 1983
3 mai 1983
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0831DEC001550889
31 août 1994
31 août 1994
Board (Oberster Agrarsenat) quashed the decision of 24 May 1984 and referred the case back to the Provincial Land Reform Board following the applicants' argument that the appeal could not have been partly
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC006286409
21 février 2012
21 février 2012
in reply submitted by the applicants, Having noted that the Governments of Belgium, Poland and Switzerland, whose nationals are some of the applicants, do not wish to intervene in the case as a third party
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-6043
8 février 2000
8 février 2000
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002475594
26 juin 1996
26 juin 1996
The applicant was not present at her house when the police and her former husband's party arrived. Her mother was, however, there.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0316DEC002897195
16 mars 2000
16 mars 2000
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC003300103
5 janvier 2006
5 janvier 2006
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0117DEC003710497
17 janvier 2002
17 janvier 2002
The 1998 preliminary inquiry against the applicant The Government submitted that Article 6 was not applicable as the complaint concerned an inquiry against the applicant, without him being formally a party
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0130DEC002575394
30 janvier 2001
30 janvier 2001
We understand that he has expressed the same view in his speech broadcast on TV during a debate of the political party leaders.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1204DEC003649997
4 décembre 2001
4 décembre 2001
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:0502DEC000824478
2 mai 1979
2 mai 1979
Partly inadmissible;partly admissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522DEC000910304
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
, is a political party represented before the Court by Mr Sh.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0112DEC002191593
12 janvier 1995
12 janvier 1995
It should be emphasised that due to such decisions harmful to the country, and other illegal acts of party and government leaders, during this period our foreign debt which in 1986 amounted to 4.119.700
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC001616090
26 septembre 2002
26 septembre 2002
The Court notes that Turkey is not a party to Protocol No. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC002778395
16 avril 1998
16 avril 1998
The applicant was heard as a party and W. was again heard as a witness.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0410DEC004277598
10 avril 2003
10 avril 2003
were taken into custody by the Edirne Anti-Terror Branch on suspicion of membership of an outlawed organisation, the DHKP-C ( Devrimci Halk Kurtuluş Partisi-Cephesi ; Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party-Front
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702DEC007533001
2 juillet 2009
2 juillet 2009
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC003517997
22 mai 2001
22 mai 2001
The ownership of the estates, consisting of several islands in the archipelago of Stockholm, were then over the years partly passed on to other members of the family.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0117DEC004786399
17 janvier 2002
17 janvier 2002
As neither party appeared at the hearing scheduled for 12 November 1998 the court stayed the proceedings ( mirovanje postupka ).
Source officiellePage 61 sur 633