CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD003103911
15 mars 2016
The claimant and his representative merely confirmed that they have a sexual relationship, which does not equate to social links.
Page 61 sur 145
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0405DEC000225764
5 avril 1968
In addition to this, the applicant's own hearing was delayed by nearly three months as a result of his changes of address.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905
16 décembre 2010
The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the admissibility and merits.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD006741411
9 mars 2023
Merits The parties’ submissions (a) The applicant 42 .
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0217REP001431088
17 février 1993
The standard record form, called the screening proforma, recorded the first applicant's name, address, nationality, marital and tenancy status, the chronological details about her arrest,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407
26 mars 2013
It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD005124911
11 juillet 2017
It is also clear that these proceedings did not in any manner address the applicant’s complaints under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0329JUD001111884
29 mars 1989
The Court heard their adresses and their replies to its questions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603JUD001907208
3 juin 2014
Merits 1. The parties’ submissions (a) The applicants’ submissions 63. The applicants reaffirmed their complaints. 64.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD000082103
15 décembre 2009
The following elements seem to me to matter here: ... • Any invasion of the protection must meet a pressing social need – not merely an individual one.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1116JUD000304119
16 novembre 2023
Ms X included their address in the application. 32 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514JUD002094921
14 mai 2024
Merits The parties’ submissions 43.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD002946403
4 novembre 2010
Shkryuba took part merely as a member of the audience, cannot be considered a valid reason.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0920JUD001464789
20 septembre 1993
Allala Bousselmi made possible the arrest in his turn of his intermediary, Sadok Hamza, by giving the latter’s address and his first name.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD003503209
4 octobre 2011
the addresses (see paragraph 27 above).
Chambre des Référés
69dd3f29cdc6046d471f8184
9 avril 2026
VERSAILLES ORDONNANCE DE RÉFÉRÉ 9 AVRIL 2026 N° RG 25/01317 - N° Portalis DB22-W-B7J-TLZG Code NAC : 54G DEMANDEURS Monsieur [Z] [J], né le 5 octobre 1972 à [Localité 1] ([Localité 2], demeurant [Adresse
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411DEC006990801
11 avril 2006
The Court notes that as a rule the ombudsman is not empowered to address binding decisions to the Government, but only to formulate recommendations (see Lehtinen v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1023JUD001552789
23 octobre 1995
The Court heard addresses by Mr Weitzel, Mr Weh and Mr Cede. AS TO THE FACTS I. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD004482708
16 juillet 2013
In his submissions on the merits of the case the public prosecutor sought the applicant’s acquittal for lack of evidence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003414807
31 mars 2016
They submitted that the information furnished by the Government merely attested to the existence of an entry in the register and nothing more. 2. The Court’s assessment 51.