CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD004637118
22 avril 2021
The High Court did not, however, find it necessary at that stage in the proceedings to adopt a stance on that argument; it sufficed for it to observe that the ruling had become legally binding and that
Page 61 sur 252
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD000117506
23 juin 2020
As regards J.D., the court found that he was legally homeless and had gained the right to a tenancy since 1993.
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2009:C200513
2 avril 2009
Lebailly-Nadjar, D. Richard, F. Nadjar et Fl.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1209DEC001183185
9 décembre 1987
The charges of the Bill of Indictment to which the applicant had raised objections had long been legally settled by the applicant's above acquittal.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0909DEC003090002
9 septembre 2003
should guide the English courts in relation to the trial of a defendant in his absence were as follows: “(1) A defendant has, in general, a right to be present at his trial and a right to be legally
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0521DEC003671397
21 mai 1998
In a letter of 10 September 1991 the Federal Minister of Justice (Bundesminister der Justiz), stated that, in his - though not legally binding - opinion, expropriations
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003114596
1 juillet 1998
The prosecutor and defending officers were not legally qualified. The applicant pleaded guilty to the charge and the proceedings were adjourned to allow a psychiatric report to be obtained.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0620JUD003327496
20 juin 2000
He observed in this connection that neither the 1986 Act nor the re-direction Order of 26 September 1996 made any provision for dealing with legally privileged materials.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909REP002528394
9 septembre 1998
The applicant was not legally represented at the committal proceedings. 27. The applicant served 5 days in prison.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC003107696
14 janvier 1998
For this reason, so the court stated, she was legally excused (laga förfall) from giving evidence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1021DEC001537589
21 octobre 1992
of objection, granted by Article 2014 of the Civil Code and by Article 230ff. of the Commercial Code, third parties, however, may never legally
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109588
9 janvier 2012
On 1 September 2000 it was legally acknowledged that the husband of the applicant was not the father of the twin sisters by judgment of the Bielefeld District Court (no. 34 F 1306/00).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925DEC005064508
25 septembre 2012
In particular, the applicant company argued that, following the Constitutional Court’s judgments, it was technically and legally impossible to have its claims registered as having been lodged
ECLI:CEDH:001-118710
18 mars 2013
Did the declaration of legal incapacity make it legally unnecessary to take into account the applicant’s will as to his confinement?
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0209DEC000929517
9 février 2021
In these cases, the condition of victim or of their successors, the extent of the damages, the nature of the facts or the causal acts, and the rest of the legally established conditions, may be proven
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003881797
(4) For appeals from a decision of an Opposition Division, a Board of Appeal shall consist of: (a) two technically qualified members and one legally qualified member, when the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD004618508
21 juin 2011
A person divested of his legal capacity could not undertake any legal act and it was in the best interests of the applicant and K. that he could not give any legally binding statement concerning his paternity
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC000320503
14 septembre 2010
The pension will be paid either personally to its beneficiary, to his legally appointed proxy, or to his legal representative.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214DEC000455015
14 décembre 2021
Procedure, the specialised panel had exclusive competence to determine whether files could be provided or used and its order of 10 January 2012 was to be treated as a final interlocutory judgment which was legally
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD002273704
12 janvier 2012
The applicant, who was severely disabled and recognised in 2005 as legally incapable, was represented by his mother.