Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200419
17 décembre 2019
17 décembre 2019
Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of her sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212649
28 septembre 2021
28 septembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in view of the refusal to grant him family visits (see
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-213186
18 octobre 2021
18 octobre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the revocation of the applicant’s residence permit and the imposition on an entry ban constitute a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-213738
2 novembre 2021
2 novembre 2021
He further argued that the initial order on his remand in custody was contrary to the requirements of the domestic law, since the preventive measure of remand in custody can be imposed only with regard
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208393
5 février 2021
5 février 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207251
5 décembre 2020
5 décembre 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of the civil proceedings in which they were found
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208725
18 février 2021
18 février 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of the disability of her child, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, considering the dismissal
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209221
18 mars 2021
18 mars 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life and home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the search of his home and person carried
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218520
24 juin 2022
24 juin 2022
applicant was ordered to pay to the State, disproportionately restricted his right of access to court, in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and/or violated his property rights, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224043
10 mars 2023
10 mars 2023
The applicant company complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that judge V was biased and decided to merge the cases into one and allocate it to herself contrary to the relevant legal framework
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224441
28 mars 2023
28 mars 2023
Moreover, contrary to the procedural rule that, in administrative proceedings, the burden of proof fell on the defendant, in the present case it was her who had to prove her submissions.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224448
28 mars 2023
28 mars 2023
The applicant company complains that such approach taken by the domestic authorities upset the principles of legal certainty and good governance and resulted in its deprivation of property contrary to
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214175
17 novembre 2021
17 novembre 2021
November 2014 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant company’s second appeal on points of law holding, this time, that the Township’s unilateral declaration had been null and void as it had been contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196794
16 septembre 2019
16 septembre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197150
3 octobre 2019
3 octobre 2019
; Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by those provisions, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC002924013
27 mai 2014
27 mai 2014
The applicant complained that, if returned to Somalia, he would be exposed to treatment contrary to Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-213400
19 octobre 2021
19 octobre 2021
14681/09, 45691/09 and 47954/09 – suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215085
16 décembre 2021
16 décembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life and home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, with respect to the search of his private premises
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219384
1 septembre 2022
1 septembre 2022
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187002
21 septembre 2018
21 septembre 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his linguistic identity contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction
Source officiellePage 61 sur 1005