He relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

    The Court will examine the complaint under Article 5   §   1 of the Convention, which provides, in so far as relevant, as follows: Article 5 “1.

    Le requérant dénonçait une violation de l’article 5 § 1 de la Convention.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

  30733/20 the applicant also raised other complaints under Article 5 of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 39.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicant complained principally that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

He also complained under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 5.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention;   4.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicant complained principally that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

    The applicants complained under Article 5 §   3 of the Convention of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 45.

In application no. 62799/14, the applicant also complained under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

They relied on Article   5   §   3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article   5   §   3 “3.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation)