CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208492
8 février 2021
Have the three psychiatric expert opinions contradicted each other in a way which could not be dissolved by the questioning of the experts and would have made the commissioning of a decisive expert opinion
Page 60 sur 1364
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3261
1 juin 2006
Law : Article 3 – The Court reiterated that it was incumbent on the Russian Government to organise its penitentiary system in a way that ensured respect for the dignity of detainees, regardless of financial
ECLI:CEDH:001-196787
17 septembre 2019
under Articles 2 and 6 of the Convention that the police operation in respect of her son which resulted in his death had been unlawful, that the use of lethal force had been disproportionate and that the way
ECLI:CEDH:001-244517
9 juillet 2025
Discontented with the way she had administered the estate, the applicant initiated civil proceedings specific to the guardianship institution, requesting the domestic courts to order her to submit a report
ECLI:CEDH:002-1234
3 novembre 2009
The Government had relied on section 28 of the Service of Process Act to justify service by way of publication.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12703
7 janvier 2020
Law – Article 8: This provision of the Convention could not be interpreted as guaranteeing prisoners the right to communicate with the outside world by way of online devices, particularly where facilities
ECLI:CEDH:001-192751
26 mars 2019
Did the applicant introduce his complaint about the reopening of the proceedings in his case by way of extension of the time-limit for an ordinary appeal within the time-limit of six months
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD000201006
17 juin 2008
Her ability to force the CSA to take enforcement action by way of judicial review did not give her any remedy in respect of delay that had already occurred. 40.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC002168293
30 juin 1993
Siv Westerberg's activities were disliked by the Swedish authorities which in different ways tried to cause difficulties for her.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC004300507
15 novembre 2011
It pointed out that, contrary to the assumption of the Koblenz Regional Court, there had been other ways to identify the driver in question.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC002434905
4 juillet 2017
On an unspecified date the Company requested reconsideration of the case by way of supervisory review.
ECLI:CEDH:001-127702
5 octobre 2013
In the e-mail the applicant suggested to the rector two ways to deal with “the situation”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC005560900
2 septembre 2004
Relevant domestic law Code of Civil Procedure as in force at the relevant time Article 319 “Judgments, court rulings and decrees which have entered into force, may be reviewed by way
ECLI:CEDH:001-207453
9 décembre 2020
At 11.30 p.m. on 3 November 2018 A. accosted the applicant on her way home from the train station. He threatened her and hit her on the back of the head.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14252
28 novembre 2023
The positive obligations arising from Article 4 might extend to the way in which domestic law regulated certain matters.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD000314108
13 juin 2017
On 30 August 2016 complaints concerning quashing by way of supervisory review of the final judgments in the applicants’ favour were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0406DEC002164593
6 avril 1994
On the same day A.L. was confronted with the applicant and subsequently with D.R. by way of a two-way mirror.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC003263796
22 novembre 2001
It found that the Rectory lacked legal interest in the matter since its own legal position was in no way affected by the registration of the donation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113JUD003939498
13 novembre 2003
The court noted in its reasoning that the passage in issue was to be understood in the way it would be perceived by an average reader.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1215DEC001053283
15 décembre 1987
This expert therefore could in no way be regarded as an expert witness for the defence.