“The recent Ministerial Conference in Rome to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Convention called upon member States of the Council of Europe to take urgent measures to assist the Court and I

Having been displeased with some of the questions asked by the applicants, M. called O., T., and P. and ordered them to take away the applicants’ cameras and the recording which they had made.

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 30 October 1998 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now therefore called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 5 August 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

    In view of all the circumstances, including - but not limited to - the nature of the contested measures and the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence on the judicial review of the so-called

against the applicant, in particular the alleged failure by the domestic courts to observe the principle of equality of arms concerning the collection and examination of evidence, including the witnesses called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 3 October 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

the applicant the sum of 1 900 guilders for non material damage and the sum of 3 087,30 guilders for costs and expenses;        Decides, therefore, that no further action is called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 11 April 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15   January 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

in accordance with Protocol No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 3 June 1998 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Conduct of national authorities: what was at stake in proceedings was of crucial importance for applicant, who has been HIV-positive from birth, and called for exceptional diligence, notwithstanding number

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 16   May 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 20   March 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; however the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

While being arrested by force, she called one of the police officers a “sheep”.

After a guardian refused to admit him to the meeting, the applicant called the police and complained about the breach of his right to be present at the meeting.

  9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 3 June 1998 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called upon to take a

      Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the Government of Switzerland, that no further action is called for in this case.    

The cell was not specially adapted for disabled persons and was cold;   she was unable to sleep and a doctor had to be called.

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 21   October 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called