CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 29 octobre 1997

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s1E59FF54 { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s35F1F2CB { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (97) 509 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No.   26363/95 S.P.R.L. ANCA AND OTHERS AGAINST BELGIUM (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 29 October 1997 at the 605th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)         The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),         Having regard to the report drawn up on 15 January 1997, by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 29 December 1994 by the company S.P.R.L. ANCA, Mr   Daniel De Keyser and Ms Marguerite Stourme against Belgium (Application No.   26363/95);         Whereas on 18 February 1997 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and the case has not been referred to the European Court of Human Rights, either by the Commission or by a State entitled to do so under Article   48 of the Convention, within the time-limit of three months from the transmission of the report to the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers; whereas, however within this time-limit, the applicants seized the Court in accordance with Protocol No. 9 but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 5 August 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called upon to take a decision in accordance with Article 32 of the Convention and with Article   48 of the Convention as amended by Article 5 of Protocol No. 9 for those States having ratified the latter;         Whereas in their application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 16   October 1996, the applicants complained of the participation of a member of the Prosecutor's Office in the deliberation of the Cour de cassation;         Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, by thirteen votes to one the opinion that there had been a violation of Article   6, paragraph   1, of the Convention;         Whereas, at the 605th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies the Committee of Ministers, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and agreed with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, by decision adopted on 29 October 1997, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention,         Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case;         Decides to pursue the examination of the present case, in accordance with Article   32 of the Convention, with a view to adopting the final resolution.