These statements are dated 8 August 2005 and one [was written] on the same day but is dated 5 August 2005.”

Events of 1 August 2016 8.     On 1 August 2016 the public utility company proceeded with the enforcement of the above order.

by Mr V.Ts. dated 14 August 2006; a statement by Mr U.V. dated 14 August 2006; a copy of the medical certificate issued by the Grozny district hospital confirming the second applicant's hospitalisation

    On 4 August 2005 the regional court upheld the decision of 8 July 2005. 37.     On 8 August 2005 counsel for the applicant appealed against the decision of 1 August 2005.

    The events of 14 August 2001 and further investigation 6.

On 14 August 1997 the Prosecutor General requested the Seimas to permit the institution of criminal proceedings against the applicant. On   19   August 1997 the Seimas agreed.

    The demonstration of 30 August 2007 7.

    In its report of 15 August 1996 UNFICYP set out the facts concerning the demonstrations held on 11 August 1996. The relevant extracts read as follows: “8.

August 1990.   Der Beschwerdeführer hat       indessen das Urteil vom 8.

rejetant sa demande tendant à voir déclarer l'Etat responsable des préjudices subis tant par elle-même que par son fils en raison des carences des services de l'Etat dans la prise en charge des personnes autistes

    On 29 August 2010 the applicant’s son died. No autopsy was carried out.

    Incident of 25 August 2006 3.

On 3 August 2017 the Zgierz District Court upheld the decision. On 12 December 2017 the Łódź Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.

On 25   August 2003 the applicant received a copy of the decision. 46.

at the crime scene of 24 August 2016.

    On 16 August 2013 the President of the First Section, acting upon the applicant’s request of 13 August 2013, decided to apply Rules 39 and 41 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the Government

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION ON ACCOUNT OF THE QUASHING OF THE JUDGMENTS OF 24   AUGUST AND 17 OCTOBER 2000 17.

A l'audience, Mme Augusta X... était absente. Le centre hospitalier était absent.

Later that day, on 31 July 2008, the applicant telephoned Mr P. and urged him to obtain the required sum of money, stating that it should be delivered to him by noon on 1 August 2008.