CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

145 résultats pour « Thierry GIORGIO »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120DEC005849708

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2012

20 novembre 2012

They also cited examples in which the domestic courts had examined identical complaints and applied the same provision in order to terminate criminal proceedings.

Page 6 sur 8

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0103DEC003479803

Admin. suprême

3 janvier 2008

3 janvier 2008

The customs department maintained that they had reasonable grounds to suspect that there were documents, in electronic or other form, on the applicants’ premises which, on the basis of reasonable suspicion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD002243120

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

They further claimed that the relevant prosecutors must have kept him informed about the appeal on points of law that they had lodged in the applicant’s case. 22 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD004290612

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2016

28 avril 2016

There was no evidence suggesting that they had refused. As the applicants had not been involved in the criminal proceedings, there had been no obligation to inform them of their rights. 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0925DEC002815903

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2008

25 septembre 2008

there was no evidence that the intruders had belonged to federal forces.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD003872605

Admin. suprême

10 février 2011

10 février 2011

There existed no grounds for revoking or varying the chosen measure.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD003812407

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2009

17 décembre 2009

They must therefore be declared admissible. 2.     Merits (a)     Article 5 § 4 of the Convention 55.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD005075707

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD001727607

Admin. suprême

11 février 2010

11 février 2010

There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923DEC004637009

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2010

23 septembre 2010

that they must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD000443904

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2008

17 janvier 2008

The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; it falls to the respondent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0712JUD004475998

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2001

12 juillet 2001

However, exceptions must be accepted when they are justified by special circumstances.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD003879807

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD001373703

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2009

28 mai 2009

They also covered Muslim Nenkayev’s mouth with adhesive tape. They further asked the third applicant whether he had any firearms.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD001635406

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

If they had carefully read those writings and the movement’s doctrine they would in fact have seen that the Raelian Movement had always strongly condemned the remarks made by one of its former members

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1015JUD001705606

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2009

15 octobre 2009

Since they had not contested this matter before the domestic courts or the Chamber, they should be estopped from doing so now. 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD001607407

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

Further, there was no provision for supplying detainees with food and drinking water, and access to a toilet was problematic.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD000718803

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2008

3 juillet 2008

However, many acts that would constitute degrading or inhuman treatment in respect of prisoners may not reach the threshold of ill-treatment when they occur in the armed forces, provided that they contribute

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0402JUD000670403

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2009

2 avril 2009

They further pointed out that the investigation into the incident had been pending and that there was no evidence that the armed men had been State agents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD001152807

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

The second and third applicants were born in 2001 and 2003, respectively. They live in the village of Prigorodnoe, the Groznenskiy District, in the Chechen Republic. 6.

Source officielle