CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.5M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

331 résultats pour « Mathilde HAAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622JUD006994901

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2004

22 juin 2004

    In support of their arguments, the Government relied on Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt , cited above, in which the Court had stressed that an electoral system had to be assessed in the light

Page 6 sur 17

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1207DEC001839591

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 1992

7 décembre 1992

  The Court observed in this respect that it did not appear from the case-file that the applicants had requested an opportunity to interrogate the anonymous informers or that they had contested the

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1848922-1953585

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2006

29 novembre 2006

In their estimation, Carlo had been about 1.75 metres from the jeep when the shot had been fired, and the officer firing the shot had therefore been able to see him.

Source officielle
CA

CHAMBRE ÉCONOMIQUE

680b1c0ec0f38137e6792b86

Appel

24 avril 2025

24 avril 2025

HAAS GESTION S.A. VALUE SQUARE FUND S.A.S. ESTRELLA S.A.S. MONETA ASSET MANAGEMENT Société ARBITER PARTNERS QP LP Société AIM FUNDS GROUP (INVESCO FUNDS GROUP) C/ S.A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC005661800

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2001

7 juin 2001

votes, which it maintained had not been counted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC005817918

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2021

8 juin 2021

The summer house had been inventoried and a technical file had been compiled, and that had led Z. to believe that his property rights had been properly established.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD001847506

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

However, the Court has established that it guarantees individual rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.

Source officielle
TA

1ère chambre

DTA_2303596_20251022

Administratif

22 octobre 2025

22 octobre 2025

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 26 juillet 2023, l’association aéroclub de la région de Sarre-Union, représentée par Me Mathias, conclut : 1°) au rejet de la requête ; 2°) à titre subsidiaire

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0925JUD001253506

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2014

25 septembre 2014

The opposition gatherings in which he had participated had been violently dispersed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC004408102

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2006

4 avril 2006

Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, she alleged that the proceedings before the Constitutional Council had been unfair because the subject matter of her application had been misinterpreted.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cdebbd3db21cbdd94f7f

Appel

3 août 2021

3 août 2021

extrait, le greffe informé par courreil du 3 août 2021 à 08h21, représenté par Me Clautaire AGOSSOU, avocat de permanence au barreau de Paris INTIMÉ : LE PREFET DES HAUTS DE SEINE représenté par Me Hajer

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228250

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2023

18 septembre 2023

The Chancellor of Justice dismissed their request, finding that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD004168306

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

    The Court notes at the outset that in cases where a post-election dispute concerning electoral rights had been subject to review by a domestic court, it has chosen to examine the complaints

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611JUD002514494

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2002

11 juin 2002

The applicants' forfeiture of their parliamentary seats following the dissolution of the DEP had had the effect of preventing a part of the population from taking part in political debate and had thus

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD000012605

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2012

22 mai 2012

In the twenty-first century, the presumption in a democratic State must be in favour of inclusion and universal suffrage has become the basic principle (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt , cited above, §

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-550602-552400

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2002

14 mai 2002

  Finding that the proceedings had lasted seven years, one month and 17 days for a single level of jurisdiction, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000464106

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

    The Government argued that the applicant had lost his “victim” status because the authorities had acknowledged the breaches of electoral law that had infringed the electoral rights of voters

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206JUD001458120

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2022

6 décembre 2022

The fact that the applicant had already been in prison during some earlier elections and had brought proceedings before the courts in relation to them has no bearing on this conclusion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1125DEC002885895

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1996

25 novembre 1996

been correct at the time it had been written.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC002920902

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

In so holding the Court of Appeal has had regard to the fact that it is not apparent that the said violation caused the suspect any substantial prejudice.”

Source officielle