CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622JUD006994901
22 juin 2004
In support of their arguments, the Government relied on Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt , cited above, in which the Court had stressed that an electoral system had to be assessed in the light
Page 6 sur 17
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1207DEC001839591
7 décembre 1992
The Court observed in this respect that it did not appear from the case-file that the applicants had requested an opportunity to interrogate the anonymous informers or that they had contested the
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1848922-1953585
29 novembre 2006
In their estimation, Carlo had been about 1.75 metres from the jeep when the shot had been fired, and the officer firing the shot had therefore been able to see him.
CHAMBRE ÉCONOMIQUE
680b1c0ec0f38137e6792b86
24 avril 2025
HAAS GESTION S.A. VALUE SQUARE FUND S.A.S. ESTRELLA S.A.S. MONETA ASSET MANAGEMENT Société ARBITER PARTNERS QP LP Société AIM FUNDS GROUP (INVESCO FUNDS GROUP) C/ S.A.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC005661800
7 juin 2001
votes, which it maintained had not been counted.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC005817918
8 juin 2021
The summer house had been inventoried and a technical file had been compiled, and that had led Z. to believe that his property rights had been properly established.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD001847506
10 janvier 2012
However, the Court has established that it guarantees individual rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.
1ère chambre
DTA_2303596_20251022
22 octobre 2025
Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 26 juillet 2023, l’association aéroclub de la région de Sarre-Union, représentée par Me Mathias, conclut : 1°) au rejet de la requête ; 2°) à titre subsidiaire
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0925JUD001253506
25 septembre 2014
The opposition gatherings in which he had participated had been violently dispersed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC004408102
4 avril 2006
Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, she alleged that the proceedings before the Constitutional Council had been unfair because the subject matter of her application had been misinterpreted.
Cour d'Appel
6253cdebbd3db21cbdd94f7f
3 août 2021
extrait, le greffe informé par courreil du 3 août 2021 à 08h21, représenté par Me Clautaire AGOSSOU, avocat de permanence au barreau de Paris INTIMÉ : LE PREFET DES HAUTS DE SEINE représenté par Me Hajer
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228250
18 septembre 2023
The Chancellor of Justice dismissed their request, finding that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD004168306
24 mai 2016
The Court notes at the outset that in cases where a post-election dispute concerning electoral rights had been subject to review by a domestic court, it has chosen to examine the complaints
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611JUD002514494
11 juin 2002
The applicants' forfeiture of their parliamentary seats following the dissolution of the DEP had had the effect of preventing a part of the population from taking part in political debate and had thus
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD000012605
22 mai 2012
In the twenty-first century, the presumption in a democratic State must be in favour of inclusion and universal suffrage has become the basic principle (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt , cited above, §
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-550602-552400
14 mai 2002
Finding that the proceedings had lasted seven years, one month and 17 days for a single level of jurisdiction, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000464106
The Government argued that the applicant had lost his “victim” status because the authorities had acknowledged the breaches of electoral law that had infringed the electoral rights of voters
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206JUD001458120
6 décembre 2022
The fact that the applicant had already been in prison during some earlier elections and had brought proceedings before the courts in relation to them has no bearing on this conclusion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1125DEC002885895
25 novembre 1996
been correct at the time it had been written.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC002920902
20 octobre 2005
In so holding the Court of Appeal has had regard to the fact that it is not apparent that the said violation caused the suspect any substantial prejudice.”