on German Unification.

    On 16 October 1991 the Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland concluded an agreement on the basis of which the German Government declared that, prompted

The second applicant commuted between Germany and Turkey.

The applicant states that he was born in Germany and received a German upbringing and education. His parents and siblings live in Germany.

       The Commission has found in previous cases relating to the Warsaw Treaty between Poland and Germany or the German-Polish Border Treaty (No. 7655-57/76, Dec. 4.10.77, D.R

The child has the French citizenship of the applicant and the German citizenship of her father, a German national born in the Democratic Republic of the Congo who is a permanent resident of Kinshasa and

On 24 November 1992 the Aliens Office again ordered the first applicant to leave the German territory.      It does not appear that the first applicant has left Germany.

   In the Treaty of 12 September 1990 on the Final Settlement with respect to Germany, the sovereignty of a united Germany was recognised.

qu'en considérant néanmoins que la somme prévue par le contrat « ne concern(ait) pas la prime de langue », mais « une augmentation de salaire dès que (la salariée) aurait atteint un niveau en langue germanique

He contends that as the German courts had not properly taken into account his recent political activities as a leading figure of the FLEC-FAC in Germany which, he claimed, confirmed the dangers to which

Democratic Republic to the Federal Republic of Germany, as regulated in the German Unification Act (Gesetz zu dem Vertrag vom 31.

  In 1998 the Bremen Regional Court granted the applicant leave to sue for damages, as her detention had been illegal under German law.

They lived in Bergfelde, Germany, where their marriage was registered. The spouses also chose German law to be applicable to their marriage. 4.

This applied, in particular, in light of Germany’s history, which meant that it was hardly conceivable that a German court would reach a similar conclusion as the Austrian Supreme Court (compare paragraph

The applicant company as well as its predecessor companies were always registered under German law and were based in Germany.

Full ownership of the land was conferred on them by a German Democratic Republic (GDR) law, which came into force in March 1990.

Greece and Germany , cited above).

The Foundation was subsequently set up and both the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German companies provided for the Foundation’s funding. I.G.

The domestic courts found that, in addition to a risk of reoffending, the applicant was not integrated into German society since she spoke no German and basic medical care for psychiatric patients was