AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC004772008
15 janvier 2013
15 janvier 2013
According to the case-law, the latter are best placed to assess the credibility of witnesses and the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, amongst many authorities, Vidal v.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253c8b2bd3db21cbdd86009
21 mars 2002
21 mars 2002
, libre Intimé Non comparant, HO-THANTH Son, né le 7 avril 1964 à VIENTIANE (LAOS), fils de De Van et de TRUONG Yen, de nationalité française, jamais condamné, célibataire, restaurateur, demeurant 2,
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD001100508
22 janvier 2013
22 janvier 2013
This judgment was served on the applicant’s lawyer on 13 July 2007.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC000909705
9 novembre 2010
9 novembre 2010
Law no. 4675 on Enforcement Judges (dated 16 May 2001) Section 4 of Law no. 4675, which lays down the competences of Enforcement Judges, provides that objections filed against disciplinary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC000066505
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
On 21 February 2001 the applicant objected to yet another order issued on 16 January 2001.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608DEC002376205
8 juin 2010
8 juin 2010
Sebes, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The respondent Government were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3127426-3473864
20 mai 2010
20 mai 2010
They found that the applicants had discontinued Yeni Evrensel and started to publish Günlük Evrensel .
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD007186401
7 juillet 2009
7 juillet 2009
The other applicants’ sentences had not yet been enforced. II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 25.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003195006
18 octobre 2011
18 octobre 2011
Courts only appointed practising lawyers and public notaries in cases where the person placed under guardianship required representation before the courts and authorities, yet persons who had studied law
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828DEC007140710
28 août 2012
28 août 2012
According to the information provided by the parties, the judicial investigation is still pending and the case is not yet ready for trial. B. Relevant domestic law 11.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108JUD002295604
8 janvier 2008
8 janvier 2008
THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 18.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC000759202
8 novembre 2005
8 novembre 2005
Relevant domestic law and practice On 17 June 2004 Polish Parliament adopted a new law ‘on complaint about a breach of a right to have one’s case heard within a reasonable time’.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC006220200
8 novembre 2005
8 novembre 2005
Mr D: “Yes, yes.”
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD001725209
20 septembre 2011
20 septembre 2011
Later on the same day the applicant was interrogated by a single judge at the Istanbul State Security Court, in the presence of his lawyer, where he repeated the statements he had made before
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0207JUD001657408
7 février 2013
7 février 2013
, has not been expressly repealed by the Law of 3 December 2001; neither can it be deduced from the terms of the later Law that it has been tacitly repealed, firstly because its provisions do not
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC001435006
12 mai 2009
12 mai 2009
Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement.
Source officielleCabinet B
680b272c52e1c4f57706f1ad
24 avril 2025
24 avril 2025
N° 167 KSe ------------ Copie exécutoire délivrée à Me LAU le 24.4.25 Copie authentique délivrée à Me WONG-YEN le 24.4.25 REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE COUR D'APPEL DE PAPEETE Chambre Civile
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0830DEC002490607
30 août 2011
30 août 2011
They were represented before the Court by Mr Turgut İnal, a lawyer practising in Balıkesir.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD003286908
21 septembre 2010
21 septembre 2010
The applicant Ali Turgay, the owner of Yeni Bakış , was prosecuted under sections 6(2) and 7(2) of Law no. 3713, as well as Articles 215 and 218 of the Criminal Code, for disseminating propaganda
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105DEC002324313
5 janvier 2016
5 janvier 2016
Relevant domestic law The relevant domestic law concerning the case is to be found in Dimech v. Malta (no. 34373/13, §§ 24-25, 2 April 2015).
Source officiellePage 6 sur 46