failure to hold a hearing on appeal: violation Article 14 Discrimination Allegedly different treatment of natural fathers and divorced fathers: no violation Facts – The applicant, Egbert Elsholz, a German

Government and the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Dieter Stephan and Mrs Beate Röhrig, are German nationals who were born in 1951 and 1952 respectively

He alleged, in particular, that the German courts had not had jurisdiction to convict him and that their wide interpretation of his crime had no basis in German or international law.

The front page of the leaflets contained the following text in bold letters (all quotes translated from German): “In the day clinic Dr M./Dr R.

The courts in the United Kingdom had to take the Court’s judgment into account just as the German courts would have to. 8.

In 1995 the German authorities granted him an unlimited residence permit. The applicant’s father, stepmother and siblings reside in Germany.

A non-national lawyer could intervene in proceedings in Germany only by working together with a German colleague, a restriction to which German lawyers were, of course, not subject.

xa0;      Having deliberated;        Decides as follows:     THE FACTS        The first applicant, born in 1966, is a German

le grief : Attendu que Mme X... a sollicité son inscription initiale sur la liste des experts judiciaires de la cour d'appel de Paris dans les rubriques interprétariat et traduction en langues germaniques

Article 9-1 Manifest religion or belief Alleged denigration by Government of religious movements classified as “sects”: no violation   Facts : The applicants are three associations registered under German

After negotiations with the cyclist’s insurers had failed, the applicant applied to the German courts on 18 September 1989, in particular seeking damages and payment of a monthly pension.

    Viola OSZ is a German and Romanian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Plauen; 6.

Applicable criteria (a)   Complexity of the case Case of some complexity: one of twenty-four constitutional appeals raising similar issues and capable of affecting pensions of large numbers of German

The German authorities ordered his expulsion immediately after he finished serving the last of his prison sentences in June 2003.

In the meantime, a German district court issued a decision confirming that Ž.P.’s decision to keep the child in Croatia had been “wrongful” within the meaning of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil

proceedings: Article 6 applicable Reasonable time Length of Constitutional Court proceedings: no violation Facts : The applicants were arrested in 1990 on suspicion of espionage on behalf of the former German

Délibéré après l'audience du 5 juillet 2022 à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, Mme Blin, présidente assesseure, Mme Arquié, première conseillère.

Délibéré après l'audience du le 5 juillet 2022 à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, Mme Blin, présidente assesseure, Mme Arquié, première conseillère.

Délibéré après l'audience du 5 juillet 2022 à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, Mme Blin, présidente assesseure, Mme Arquié, première conseillère.

Délibéré après l'audience du 5 juillet 2022 à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, Mme Blin, présidente assesseure, Mme Arquié, première conseillère.