Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 19 novembre 2021 et un mémoire enregistré le 8 décembre 2021, Me Gaëlle Ducoin, représentant M.

It further concerns the use of the statements obtained from the co ‑ defendants in the absence of a lawyer and under alleged duress during the preliminary investigation stage (see Erkapic v.

One of the witnesses was heard during the hearing via the audiovisual information system “SEGBIS” ( Ses ve Görüntü Bilişim Sistemi ).

Turkey - 28809/05 Judgment 2.3.2010 [Section II] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Suicide of soldier with known psychological disorders during military service: violation   Facts –

During his pre-trial detention, the first applicant was transferred to a punishment cell as a disciplinary measure.

    According to the Government, Ahmet Çakıcı was not taken into custody by the gendarmes during the operation on 8 November 1993.

He indicated during an interview that he had witnessed the ill-treatment of the victim and accused one of the police officers, in particular, of being responsible.

During this period, he remained handcuffed for around three hours.

The applicant, who had been participating in the protest, was arrested and convicted for assaulting a police officer during the dispersal.

The applicant’s statements remained unchanged during the pre-trial investigation and trial. She did not confess to the crime in question at any stage of the proceedings.

police questioning: violation Article 6-3-c Legal assistance of own choosing Failure to inform suspect that his family had appointed a lawyer to represent him during police questioning: violation Facts

On 8 July 2020 they denied his request to attend every Saturday for a Sabbath service, citing as grounds for their decision the measures introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The applicant complains that he was denied a lawyer of his own choosing whilst being held incommunicado, that he was not allowed to communicate with the lawyer appointed to represent him before and during

During the trial the applicants were placed in a glass cabin. On 2   March 2017 the presiding judge ordered the removal of the second and third applicants from the courtroom.

On 14 July 2003 Parliament passed the Act on liability of the Republic of Croatia for damage caused by members of the Croatian army and police when acting in their official capacity during the homeland

, hung by the arms and subjected to electric shocks during his time in police custody.

    During several periods between 17 March and 2 April 2009 the applicant was held in the IVS Pavlovo in the Nizhniy Novgorod Region.

    The applicant complained about his confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against him.