CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0517JUD006510214
17 mai 2022
The applicant submitted that he was not to be blamed for the authorities’ mistakes: he had submitted to the Court what he had received. 19.
Page 59 sur 123
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC003795209
26 novembre 2013
He argued that he had been receiving treatment for migraine, for which he blamed long-term exposure to radiation. 7.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203103
4 mai 2020
He was also found in possession of some notes which blamed national companies to be involved in war scenarios with a list of their power and gas plants located in the city of Bologna. 17.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD003001905
12 février 2009
Nor is it convinced that the applicant can be blamed for delaying the proceedings for ten months.
ECLI:CEDH:001-179708
30 novembre 2017
Subsequently they blamed each other for beginning it. In the course of the fight M. was stabbed in the back with a metal skewer. Sa. caught one of the Chinese students, Ch.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD002660202
18 décembre 2008
In this connection, the Court reiterates that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the venues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD000834913
12 janvier 2016
However, the Court notes that it has been its constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his or her interests
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0130JUD003391596
30 janvier 2001
As to the conduct of the applicant, the Court has consistently held that applicants cannot be blamed for making full use of the remedies available to them under domestic law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920DEC002095221
20 septembre 2022
The Court next notes that the applicant could not be blamed for prolonging the proceedings before the Constitutional Court, except for the situation in which the Constitutional Court was
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1012JUD001092903
12 octobre 2006
He submitted that he could not be blamed for enlarging the scope of his claims three times because of the increase, with time, of his actual medical and legal costs.
Cour d'Appel
6253cac0bd3db21cbdd8bf4a
27 juin 2008
BLASSEL DEBATS : à l'audience publique du 07 Mai 2008 ARRET : Contradictoire prononcé par sa mise à disposition au greffe le 27 Juin 2008, les parties présentes en ayant été préalablement avisées
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD001600404
8 janvier 2009
In respect of the argument concerning additional claims, the Court observes that the applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD005967014
22 septembre 2022
The appellate court de facto blamed the applicant for being beaten by her husband, reflecting a discriminatory attitude towards the applicant as a woman and indicating prejudice existing within
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD002896103
17 décembre 2009
The Court reiterates that at all events applicants cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in their defence (see Yağcı and Sargın v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC002774195
22 octobre 1997
The applicant cannot be blamed herefor. It must also be remembered that it was the Federal Tax Administration, and not the applicant, who instituted the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0926JUD000533713
26 septembre 2023
The Court is therefore not persuaded by the Government’s argument that the applicant should be blamed for not complying with the rules of appeal. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324JUD006193000
24 mars 2005
As to his own conduct, the applicant submitted that he could not be blamed for having used all legal remedies available to him and that he had not contributed to the length of the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC006036708
13 mai 2014
He emphasised that, while certain physiological features of women – for example, during pregnancy – could reasonably and objectively justify a differential treatment, a blanket distinction between men
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0603REP002828695
3 juin 1999
The courts were obviously overtaxed by the entire proceedings, and he cannot be blamed for this. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD004243102
14 novembre 2008
In the Court’s view, in the absence of such an initiative and of clear instructions as to the enforcement procedure to be followed, the applicant cannot be blamed for an alleged delay in submitting