CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14096
1 juin 2023
That argument suggested that the alleged excessive formalism had consisted of the refusal of the domestic courts to disregard the applicable statutory provision and grant the applicant company locus standi
Page 59 sur 2256
ECLI:CEDH:002-14098
Such a secondary argument could not be equated with a complaint since, as argued by the applicant, the disciplinary chamber’s composition had not been the cause or the fact constitutive of the alleged
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD002482714
The alleged depreciation of the merchandise is not in any way substantiated.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD001191403
24 octobre 2006
Preliminary objection partially allowed (victim);Remainder inadmissible concerning four applicants;Violation of P1-1 concerning four applicants;Pecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage -
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1221JUD000723403
21 décembre 2006
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 -
2ème chambre (formation à 3)
DCA_21BX02745_20231116
16 novembre 2023
B C a demandé au tribunal administratif de Bordeaux de condamner la communauté de communes du Val d'Albret, devenue Albret Communauté, à lui verser les sommes de 49 454 euros au titre de ses pertes
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC003134720
5 septembre 2023
In the absence of any description in the complaint of the alleged abuse, Gj.G.’s note provided the only indication of the type and nature of the alleged attack by O.C.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249938
2 avril 2026
He also alleged that the police had ill-treated the applicant in order to obtain his confession to the murder.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC002711708
6 décembre 2011
Detention conditions and alleged interference with the applicant’s right of petition in Aiud Prison 7.
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C200866
8 juin 2017
Otto E..., présenté comme un ami du galeriste parisien Aittouares où l'oeuvre sera ensuite exposée, et qui prétendait détenir le tableau de son grand-père, lequel aurait été un ami du marchand d'art Alfred
ECLI:CEDH:001-244716
8 août 2025
The applicant claims that she was blackmailed by the alleged perpetrator into not reporting the incident immediately, and she filed a complaint only several hours later.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100579
14 mai 2013
Alfred P..., domicilié... ..., 45°/ Mme Monique P..., domiciliée... 46°/ M. Ralph P..., domicilié...... , 47°/ Mme Rosella P..., domiciliée..., 48°/ M.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214595
30 novembre 2021
The constitutional complaints concerned an alleged failure of the lower courts to give reasoned decisions and, as regards application no. 41371/21, an alleged breach of the principle of equality of arms
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0122JUD003818597
22 janvier 2004
The applicant alleged, in particular, that proceedings for a permit to install a drainage system had lasted unreasonably long and that in these proceedings no public hearing had been held
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD007446301
13 juillet 2006
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION 23.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0925JUD003145215
25 septembre 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 8.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14466
3 décembre 2024
Furthermore, similar standards had been relied on in a number of cases of alleged “pushback”.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49204
5 juin 1964
as regards the Application of Friedrich Steinko (No. 964/60) the entire Application in which the Applicant alleged violations of Article 6 (art. 6) in that the decision of the Court
ECLI:CEDH:001-243296
25 avril 2025
Vira Ivanivna GYL against Ukraine lodged on 20 July 2020 communicated on 25 April 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants complain, under Articles 3, 9, 13 and 14 of the Convention, about an alleged
ECLI:CEDH:001-191326
29 janvier 2019
It further concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his alleged inability to examine the witnesses against him in person before the trial court (see