CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Tribunal Administratif de Cergy-Pontoise
ORTA_2524473_20251223
23 décembre 2025
Oise la possibilité de procéder à un changement de statut, en étant autorisée à déposer une demande de titre de séjour portant la mention « recherche d’emploi – création d’entreprise » à l’adresse « pref-rdv-etr-argenteuil
Page 58 sur 477
ORTA_2605014_20260316
16 mars 2026
Hauts-de-Seine a mis en place une procédure qui permet aux ressortissants étrangers souhaitant demander leur admission exceptionnelle au séjour de déposer un dossier par la voie d’une adresse électronique pref-rdv-aes
ORTA_2605042_20260316
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409JUD003961118
9 avril 2024
Questions of Proof Burden of proof 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705JUD003102915
5 juillet 2022
Section 27(2) provides that when a court is comprised of an even number of judges who reach a tie vote, the judgment will be issued against the party who has the burden of proof.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0717JUD000521223
17 juillet 2025
However, he had failed to submit such proof, only referring to his right to social benefits.
AFFAIRES COURANTES
6a0b56e1cdc6046d471c7f70
4 mai 2026
l'applicabilité des normes OEPP invoquées, qu'elle présente comme relatives aux produits phytosanitaires et non aux biostimulants, ainsi que la valeur probante et l'impartialité des attestations produites (Prof
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD008105717
14 janvier 2025
However, the Constitutional Court did not clarify in what way a party could provide positive proof of the date of first notification (compare Aždajić v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169254
6 novembre 2016
As regards the second applicant the court held that she was currently a student and there was no proof in the file to show that she had ever had an income.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1015DEC005463013
15 octobre 2019
However, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705DEC002035117
To assess this evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt” but adds that such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences
4ème Chambre
DTA_1904174_20230621
21 juin 2023
En second lieu, l'orientation d'aménagement et de programmation des Soulières couvre une zone intégralement située en zone bleue du plan de prévention des risques d'incendie de forêt (PPRIF).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128DEC004899709
28 janvier 2020
It acquitted the applicant of injuring two persons and the murder of one individual for lack of proof. This judgment became final on appeal on 16 May 2008. 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC004422398
2 juillet 2002
He complains also under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention in respect of the burden of proof placed upon him to establish his defence under section 5(5) of the Act.
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:C200034
8 janvier 2015
conclusions devant la Cour (conclusions du 7 mars 2011 page 17) Maître MAY avait fait valoir notamment que les trois acquéreurs ont contribué à la réalisation de leur préjudice en réglant directement à PRY
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-85935
27 mars 2008
time was not compatible with the Convention as it required the defendant to prove the truth of any negative statement, whether factual statements or, as in this case, value judgments not susceptible of proof
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412DEC000847015
12 avril 2018
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC003629812
19 septembre 2017
Tediashvili), the Government objected that, unlike the other nine applicants, these two applicants had not submitted any proof, either at the domestic level or in the proceedings before the Court
ECLI:CEDH:001-171218
17 janvier 2017
As regards its veracity, pursuant to Article 1087.1 of the Civil Code the burden of proof was on the applicant company.
ECLI:CEDH:001-186348
27 août 2018
On 5 September 2015 Nowy Tomyśl District Police refused to open the investigation owing to lack of sufficient proof that an offence had been committed.