AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211DEC002540608
11 décembre 2018
11 décembre 2018
When questioned again, he confirmed the veracity of his initial statement and maintained his guilt.
Source officielle5ème chambre
DCA_21NT00294_20220419
19 avril 2022
19 avril 2022
Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 27 mai et 20 juillet 2021 (ce dernier non communiqué), la commune de Gouesnach, représentée par Mes Gourvennec et Guil, conclut au rejet de la requête et à
Source officielle5e Section - 4e Chambre
DTA_2000753_20230331
31 mars 2023
31 mars 2023
A B, représenté par la SCP Tarlier - Rèche - Guille-Meghabbar, avocats, demande au tribunal : 1°) de condamner l'Etat à lui verser une somme de 50 000 euros à titre de provision à valoir sur l'indemnisation
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0511DEC004152598
11 mai 2000
11 mai 2000
The applicant then pleaded guilty as charged and, as a result, sections 18 and 19 of the 1984 Act did not subsequently come into play at all in the determination of his guilt or innocence.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1128JUD001284387
28 novembre 1991
28 novembre 1991
Mr Koster claimed in the first place 2,400 guilders for damage.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144074
14 avril 2014
14 avril 2014
He also alleged that in the decision of 19 December 2007 Judges BZ and GN had made statements which demonstrated that they had been already convinced of his guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1021DEC002613895
21 octobre 1996
21 octobre 1996
Such a person shall be considered innocent until his or her guilt has been established by a final decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD007721717
18 juillet 2024
18 juillet 2024
On an unspecified date, T., one of the hunters, fully admitted his guilt. On 10/12/2010 T. was notified of suspicion of unintentional killing. On 29/06/2011 an indictment was sent to a court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC005489216
25 juin 2019
25 juin 2019
Decisions taken in this context could not be regarded as requiring a prior determination of guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1021DEC002706195
21 octobre 1996
21 octobre 1996
Such a person shall be considered innocent until his or her guilt has been established by a final decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1213DEC002633095
13 décembre 1996
13 décembre 1996
In 1985 the applicant company subcontracted certain works to another company S. and paid a total amount of 45.282,45 Dutch guilders for social security contributions to
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC005638610
17 novembre 2020
17 novembre 2020
It reiterates that a prosecutor’s decision to apply a deterrent and punitive penalty, after assessing evidence and determining the guilt of the accused, may amount to a “conviction” within the meaning
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1024REP002369994
24 octobre 1995
24 octobre 1995
Government were willing to pay the applicant, in full and final settlement of the matter, the legal costs he had incurred in the proceedings before the Commission and an ex gratia payment of 100 Dutch guilders
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214DEC003261219
14 décembre 2021
14 décembre 2021
The court explained in its judgment that the case was attributed to Judge D.F. on a proper legal basis; that the applicant’s guilt was determined on the basis of a large body of evidence; and that the
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0707REP001484789
7 juillet 1992
7 juillet 1992
Following the applicant's request for compensation for the days he had been detained on remand, the Regional Court-Martial of Arnhem awarded him 1,000 Dutch guilders, but rejected his
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC004922699
18 janvier 2000
18 janvier 2000
The Court is of the opinion that the Amsterdam Court of Appeal did not, as the applicant alleges, operate an irrebuttable presumption of guilt contrary to that provision.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0724JUD003753897
24 juillet 2001
24 juillet 2001
2001 the Court received the following declaration, dated 21 May 2001, from the Government: “I declare that the Government of the Netherlands offer to pay, on an ex gratia basis, 6,302.75 Netherlands Guilders
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1207DEC001754690
7 décembre 1992
7 décembre 1992
She receives a monthly pension of 1.432,35 Dutch guilders net from a Dutch pension fund. The applicant has four adult children.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0913REP002307393
13 septembre 1995
13 septembre 1995
following terms: - the payment by the Netherlands Government to the applicant of an amount of 3.000,- Dutch guilders
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710DEC000677225
10 juillet 2025
10 juillet 2025
At the outset, the Court observes that the applicant’s guilt was established in criminal proceedings conducted in 2015 and 2016, in the course of which the courts had examined a number of
Source officiellePage 58 sur 292