CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 445 résultats pour « Blavet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC004551809

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

Commission’s decision of 14 January 1998, where the Commission considered that the suspension of the criminal proceedings due to the objective fact of the mental illness of the accused could not be blamed

Page 58 sur 123

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC000990910

Admin. suprême

18 février 2014

18 février 2014

challenge this decision on the grounds, inter alia , that it violated his rights under Article 8 of the Convention as it was disproportionate and/or had been made in compliance with an unpublished blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD005610907

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2021

13 juillet 2021

    The applicant submitted, among other things, that the domestic law imposed a blanket ban on any display of Nazi and similar symbols regardless of its context in violation of the provision

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC005138813

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

xa0; Furthermore, the Court notes that the Government in the present case again submitted examples of Constitutional Court case-law (see paragraphs 17-21 above) which show that it has not adopted a blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123DEC000760419

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

    In considering the safety of the applicant’s conviction, the Court of Appeal noted that neither the Anti-Trafficking Convention nor the Anti ‑ Trafficking Directive conferred a blanket

Source officielle
TCOM

8ème chambre

69eaee5fcdc6046d4755c672

Commerce

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

Chambre N° PCL : 2024J00790 SAS C.A.T N° RG: 2025L02574 DEBITEUR SAS C.A.T [Adresse 1] [Localité 1] RCS [Localité 2] : 351605704 1989 B 3778 Enseigne : AUTO BILAN BOULOGNE Représentant légal : Mme [J] BLAYEZ

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127JUD000302303

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2008

27 novembre 2008

In particular, applicants cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in their defence (see Yağcı and Sargın v. Turkey , 8 June 1995, § 66, Series A no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0503DEC001285887

Admin. suprême

3 mai 1988

3 mai 1988

      it must be considered most likely that the case contained wrong information for which the applicant could not be blamed and that the case subsequent to its re-opening will

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD000961905

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

As to the applicant’s lodging of additional claims and applications, it has been the Court’s constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;PANELREFUSALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-6951456-9350980

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2020

14 décembre 2020

P16-2018-001, §   25, 10 April 2019 (“ Advisory opinion P16 ‑ 2018-001 ”), and Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC007685411

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

    Detainees had not been provided with sheets, blankets, or hygiene and cleaning products.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14340

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2024

13 juin 2024

obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life Impossibility for a terminally ill patient, suffering from an uncurable progressive neurodegenerative disease, to be assisted in dying, by virtue of a blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004065398

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2002

3 octobre 2002

Books, a metal bowl, plastic bottles, clothes and blankets are visible on the photograph. Inmates were given one hour out-of-cell time in the morning in an open yard.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129JUD001730303

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2005

29 novembre 2005

The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC000170203

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2007

2 octobre 2007

The Court also recalls that, although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2135685-2278794

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2007

9 octobre 2007

Indeed, that court had even been prevented from verifying the applicant’s ability to pay by a blanket prohibition on waiving court fees under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002805495

Admin. suprême

26 juin 1996

26 juin 1996

The applicant should not be blamed for not objecting to the defendants' request for an adjournment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD002951004

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

The Court reiterates that the applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interests (see Sokolov v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC001888291

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1996

17 janvier 1996

  The applicant had not contested the finding of the Supreme Court but only argued that he could not be blamed for having violated the law as he was not a jurist but an entrepreneur who had to take

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD001469218

Admin. suprême

20 février 2024

20 février 2024

    Against this background, the applicant cannot be blamed for having been cautious by initially setting his claim for non-pecuniary damages lower and increasing it later. 25.

Source officielle