CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC004551809
7 mars 2017
Commission’s decision of 14 January 1998, where the Commission considered that the suspension of the criminal proceedings due to the objective fact of the mental illness of the accused could not be blamed
Page 58 sur 123
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC000990910
18 février 2014
challenge this decision on the grounds, inter alia , that it violated his rights under Article 8 of the Convention as it was disproportionate and/or had been made in compliance with an unpublished blanket
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD005610907
13 juillet 2021
The applicant submitted, among other things, that the domestic law imposed a blanket ban on any display of Nazi and similar symbols regardless of its context in violation of the provision
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC005138813
19 septembre 2017
xa0; Furthermore, the Court notes that the Government in the present case again submitted examples of Constitutional Court case-law (see paragraphs 17-21 above) which show that it has not adopted a blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123DEC000760419
23 novembre 2021
In considering the safety of the applicant’s conviction, the Court of Appeal noted that neither the Anti-Trafficking Convention nor the Anti ‑ Trafficking Directive conferred a blanket
8ème chambre
69eaee5fcdc6046d4755c672
9 octobre 2025
Chambre N° PCL : 2024J00790 SAS C.A.T N° RG: 2025L02574 DEBITEUR SAS C.A.T [Adresse 1] [Localité 1] RCS [Localité 2] : 351605704 1989 B 3778 Enseigne : AUTO BILAN BOULOGNE Représentant légal : Mme [J] BLAYEZ
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127JUD000302303
27 novembre 2008
In particular, applicants cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in their defence (see Yağcı and Sargın v. Turkey , 8 June 1995, § 66, Series A no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0503DEC001285887
3 mai 1988
it must be considered most likely that the case contained wrong information for which the applicant could not be blamed and that the case subsequent to its re-opening will
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD000961905
19 février 2013
As to the applicant’s lodging of additional claims and applications, it has been the Court’s constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;PANELREFUSALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-6951456-9350980
14 décembre 2020
P16-2018-001, § 25, 10 April 2019 (“ Advisory opinion P16 ‑ 2018-001 ”), and Advisory opinion concerning the use of the "blanket reference" or "legislation by reference" technique in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC007685411
24 janvier 2017
Detainees had not been provided with sheets, blankets, or hygiene and cleaning products.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14340
13 juin 2024
obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life Impossibility for a terminally ill patient, suffering from an uncurable progressive neurodegenerative disease, to be assisted in dying, by virtue of a blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004065398
3 octobre 2002
Books, a metal bowl, plastic bottles, clothes and blankets are visible on the photograph. Inmates were given one hour out-of-cell time in the morning in an open yard.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129JUD001730303
29 novembre 2005
The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC000170203
2 octobre 2007
The Court also recalls that, although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2135685-2278794
9 octobre 2007
Indeed, that court had even been prevented from verifying the applicant’s ability to pay by a blanket prohibition on waiving court fees under the Code of Civil Procedure.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002805495
26 juin 1996
The applicant should not be blamed for not objecting to the defendants' request for an adjournment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD002951004
5 octobre 2006
The Court reiterates that the applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interests (see Sokolov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC001888291
17 janvier 1996
The applicant had not contested the finding of the Supreme Court but only argued that he could not be blamed for having violated the law as he was not a jurist but an entrepreneur who had to take
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD001469218
20 février 2024
Against this background, the applicant cannot be blamed for having been cautious by initially setting his claim for non-pecuniary damages lower and increasing it later. 25.