They submitted that the claim in respect of costs and expenses had not been duly documented. 30.

It concluded that the training exercises had been based on regulations which had not been publicly accessible. The applicants had been injured and humiliated during the exercises.

  An incident report drawn up on the following day stated that Mr Zengin had been killed by fire from “terrorists” and that his body had been found near his home.

He also complained that he had been convicted on the basis of evidence that had not been obtained lawfully. He relied on Articles 3, 8 and 6.

Accordingly, there had been no breach of the above provision.

s opinion, which had been lodged when the second set of proceedings had been pending before the first-instance court.

A B a demandé au tribunal administratif de Nantes d'annuler l'arrêté du 8 mars 2021 par lequel le maire de La Bernerie-en-Retz a délivré à la société civile de construction-vente (SCCV) Port-Saint-Jacques

Monsieur X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 8 février 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le président du Groupe BERRI à sa demande

  In its Chamber judgment of 25 April 2006 (press release No. 234 , 2006) the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention.

fait procéder à la rénovation d'un immeuble lui appartenant, en confiant au Cabinet Stremsdorfer, ingénieur-conseil, une mission d'étude du système de chauffage et d'alimentation en gaz, la société Berne

  Decision of the Court   Article 11   The Court noted that the national authorities had been notified of the one-day strike in advance.

Article 3 :Les conclusions de la commune de Bernex tendant à la condamnation de M. et Mme A au paiement des frais exposés et non compris dans les dépens sont rejetées.

The Court recalled that a person could be considered to have been “charged” for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 when that individual’s situation had been “substantially affected”.

given to the applicant in prison; unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the conditions of his detention; by six votes to one, that there had been a violation

Further information from other sources had subsequently been received.

had been delayed and no land had been returned to the applicants.

2009, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on 30   June 2009 and that no extension of time had been

By a letter of 6 May 2009, sent by registered mail, the applicant was reminded that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 9 April 2009 and that no extension of time had been

dated 18 February 2010, sent by registered post, the applicant's representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the his observations had expired and that no extension of time had been