CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0704DEC002521294

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 1995

4 juillet 1995

       The applicant and his wife filed an objection with the school board against the decision of 17 June 1988.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222472

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2022

12 décembre 2022

first applicant, Narek Sardaryan, was born in 1990 and lived with his family, namely his parents (his father Suren Sardanyan and his mother Lusik   Sardaryan – the second and third applicants), wife

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC000447906

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2008

4 novembre 2008

status and legal effects of marriage marked it out as different and that the policy underlying the concession given to married couples in order to promote marriage was proportionate and well within the wide

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1004DEC001189985

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 1989

4 octobre 1989

  In 1975 it obtained a licence to serve wine and beer in respect of one part of its business, and in 1977 it obtained a full licence to serve alcoholic beverages.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1585557-1668144

Admin. suprême

16 février 2006

16 février 2006

    Principal facts The applicants, Mohamed Ahmed Osman and his wife Ilmie Hasan Osman, are Bulgarian nationals who belong to the Turkish ethnic minority.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC001183806

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

On 29 March 1994, the Margraten municipal council adopted the new zoning plan “Witte Vlekken”, which was preservation-oriented.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC003831202

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2006

18 mai 2006

Meanwhile, Ž.J. died, but his wife, A.J., continues to live in the flat. B.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-922842-949026

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2004

29 janvier 2004

Beschwerden geht es um eine der großen Fragen, die sich nach der deutschen Wiedervereinigung gestellt haben: In welcher Weise ist den Personen, die entweder nach 1949 in der DDR oder ‑   wie

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0621JUD001073084

Admin. suprême

21 juin 1988

21 juin 1988

   On 8 February 1979, his wife sued for divorce.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-97696

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2010

4 mars 2010

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Résolution CM/ResDH(2010)6 [1]   Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Wisse

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187030

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2018

17 septembre 2018

applicants, whereby they had argued that their lands had been expropriated de facto by the military forces, were dismissed by the domestic court, who found that the area at issue was not surrounded by barbed wire

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC001470006

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

By letter of 26 January 2016 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 15   October 2014 and that the late applicant’s wife wished to continue the proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206774

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2020

24 novembre 2020

THE CASE The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the decisions given by the domestic courts, which refused to order a second expert examination of the applicant’s deceased wife

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229560

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2023

16 novembre 2023

The applicant lived with his wife and their minor daughter (born on 18   January 2018) in Texas since 2017.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68079-68547

Admin. suprême

29 juin 1999

29 juin 1999

Representatives of the parties   Government:   Martin Eaton , Agent ,   Nicholas Lavender , Counsel ,   Michael Collon , Adviser ;   Applicants:   Ben Emmerson , Counsel ,   Ian Wise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-948

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

08 Judgment 20.5.2010 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Order annulling adoption following the divorce of the adoptive parents: violation   Facts – The applicant and his wife

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-996

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2010

6 avril 2010

The incident had concerned an altercation between A., a female friend B., and A.’s wife that had taken place outside the matrimonial home.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7408

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

Accordingly, since it had to balance two competing interests which were both protected by the Convention, the respondent State had enjoyed a wide margin of appreciation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231915

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2024

7 mars 2024

investigator, Izhevsk 20/04/2020, the final decision on the matter was taken by the Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic on 25/05/2020 no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218378

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2022

15 juin 2022

Published on 4 July 2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 31942/21 J.D. against Lithuania lodged on 4 June 2021 communicated on 15 June 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant and his former wife

Source officielle

Page 57 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →