AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0704DEC002521294
4 juillet 1995
4 juillet 1995
The applicant and his wife filed an objection with the school board against the decision of 17 June 1988.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222472
12 décembre 2022
12 décembre 2022
first applicant, Narek Sardaryan, was born in 1990 and lived with his family, namely his parents (his father Suren Sardanyan and his mother Lusik Sardaryan – the second and third applicants), wife
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC000447906
4 novembre 2008
4 novembre 2008
status and legal effects of marriage marked it out as different and that the policy underlying the concession given to married couples in order to promote marriage was proportionate and well within the wide
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1004DEC001189985
4 octobre 1989
4 octobre 1989
In 1975 it obtained a licence to serve wine and beer in respect of one part of its business, and in 1977 it obtained a full licence to serve alcoholic beverages.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1585557-1668144
16 février 2006
16 février 2006
Principal facts The applicants, Mohamed Ahmed Osman and his wife Ilmie Hasan Osman, are Bulgarian nationals who belong to the Turkish ethnic minority.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC001183806
13 novembre 2008
13 novembre 2008
On 29 March 1994, the Margraten municipal council adopted the new zoning plan “Witte Vlekken”, which was preservation-oriented.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC003831202
18 mai 2006
18 mai 2006
Meanwhile, Ž.J. died, but his wife, A.J., continues to live in the flat. B.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-922842-949026
29 janvier 2004
29 janvier 2004
Beschwerden geht es um eine der großen Fragen, die sich nach der deutschen Wiedervereinigung gestellt haben: In welcher Weise ist den Personen, die entweder nach 1949 in der DDR oder ‑ wie
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0621JUD001073084
21 juin 1988
21 juin 1988
On 8 February 1979, his wife sued for divorce.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-97696
4 mars 2010
4 mars 2010
margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Résolution CM/ResDH(2010)6 [1] Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Wisse
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187030
17 septembre 2018
17 septembre 2018
applicants, whereby they had argued that their lands had been expropriated de facto by the military forces, were dismissed by the domestic court, who found that the area at issue was not surrounded by barbed wire
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC001470006
31 mai 2016
31 mai 2016
By letter of 26 January 2016 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 15 October 2014 and that the late applicant’s wife wished to continue the proceedings
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206774
24 novembre 2020
24 novembre 2020
THE CASE The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the decisions given by the domestic courts, which refused to order a second expert examination of the applicant’s deceased wife
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229560
16 novembre 2023
16 novembre 2023
The applicant lived with his wife and their minor daughter (born on 18 January 2018) in Texas since 2017.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68079-68547
29 juin 1999
29 juin 1999
Representatives of the parties Government: Martin Eaton , Agent , Nicholas Lavender , Counsel , Michael Collon , Adviser ; Applicants: Ben Emmerson , Counsel , Ian Wise
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-948
20 mai 2010
20 mai 2010
08 Judgment 20.5.2010 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Order annulling adoption following the divorce of the adoptive parents: violation Facts – The applicant and his wife
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-996
6 avril 2010
6 avril 2010
The incident had concerned an altercation between A., a female friend B., and A.’s wife that had taken place outside the matrimonial home.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7408
19 février 2013
19 février 2013
Accordingly, since it had to balance two competing interests which were both protected by the Convention, the respondent State had enjoyed a wide margin of appreciation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231915
7 mars 2024
7 mars 2024
investigator, Izhevsk 20/04/2020, the final decision on the matter was taken by the Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic on 25/05/2020 no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218378
15 juin 2022
15 juin 2022
Published on 4 July 2022 SECOND SECTION Application no. 31942/21 J.D. against Lithuania lodged on 4 June 2021 communicated on 15 June 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant and his former wife
Source officiellePage 57 sur 606