CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110075
31 janvier 2012
The march was organised by an organisation found to be closely linked to the first applicant.
Page 57 sur 295
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1014DEC004262214
14 octobre 2014
The spouses separated on 21 May 2008 and divorced on 12 March 2009.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0226JUD001287187
26 février 1992
The period to be taken into consideration began on 7 March 1986 when the proceedings were instituted against the INPS in the magistrate's court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0524JUD001189085
24 mai 1991
On 25 July 1990 the President gave him leave to use the Italian language (Rule 27 para. 3). 3.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1487867-1556041
20 octobre 2005
It affixed a sign with the party’s name in the two languages spoken in the region, Greek and Macedonian, to the balcony of the premises.
ECLI:CEDH:001-153890
19 mars 2015
avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7ACB8D74 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } Communicated on 19 March
ECLI:CEDH:001-113587
12 septembre 2012
According to the applicant, on 15 March 2006 the Kyivskyy District Court, instructed by the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal, ordered the prosecutor to carry out an inquiry into the applicant’s allegations
4eme Chambre Section 1
6960b09bcdc6046d47b7d6a2
8 janvier 2026
FAROUZE CONFIRMATION Grosse délivrée le à Me Ophélie BENOIT-DAIEF Me Frédéric LANGLOIS REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE AU
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:CO00117
5 février 2013
dix ans à compter de cette constatation et que, faute de cette diligence, ils sont irrecevables à rechercher la responsabilité de la banque pour les investissements et les opérations antérieurs au 9 mars
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11029
26 avril 2016
However, a civil claim against the police by the fifth applicant, whose prosecution for using foul language was discontinued under the statute of limitations, was dismissed.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177786
18 septembre 2017
The first applicant claimed to be the sole author of the article (essentially about the Chuvash language – a second official language in the republic together with Russian – in the past and in modern Russia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0227JUD001205386
27 février 1992
Following that date, six other hearings took place on 4 November 1983, 17 January, 15 May, 6 November and 4 December 1984 and 12 March 1985.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0226DEC003063396
26 février 1997
MARXER B.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0923JUD005093910
23 septembre 2021
The plot of land was situated in front of the Language Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia (“the Language Institute”), located at the intersection of Sayat ‑
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD003841908
13 juin 2017
On 25 March 2004 the applicant amended his proposal to this effect. 10.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC005534514
13 décembre 2016
On 20 March 2014 a judge of the Regional Court decided not to refer the case for consideration by the Presidium of that court. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC000596402
8 juillet 2004
On 12 March 2002 the Supreme Court of the Adygheya Republic quashed the decision of 5 February 2002 and remitted the case for a new examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924DEC003601316
24 septembre 2019
and unpaid maintenance instalments for the period from September 2009 to March 2014 – a total amount of 6,641.47 euros (EUR) plus statutory default interest. 9 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001918704
26 janvier 2010
On 14 March 2002 the court scheduled a hearing. It was adjourned as the parties failed to appear.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1497079-1565996
8 novembre 2005
At these meetings the applicant and his family were prohibited from talking in any language other than Russian.