AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC004626499
3 septembre 2002
3 septembre 2002
He submits that he was not provided with a translator during the interrogation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1212DEC001247786
12 décembre 1987
12 décembre 1987
He had also shown this driving licence at a traffic control during the spring of 1985.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324DEC006635401
24 mars 2005
24 mars 2005
He alleges that he was subjected to ill-treatment during his detention in police custody.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903DEC004878922
3 septembre 2024
3 septembre 2024
The fact that, finally, no weapon was found during the search (see paragraphs 2 and 7 above) does not invalidate the authorities’ assessment of the situation. 27.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD003388205
15 octobre 2013
15 octobre 2013
Several incidents occurred during the proceedings related to the pre ‑ trial detention. 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174186
9 mai 2017
9 mai 2017
March 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175025
8 juin 2017
8 juin 2017
November 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181513
15 février 2018
15 février 2018
Was that regime indiscriminately applied to all life prisoners during the first ten years of post-conviction detention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206671
18 novembre 2020
18 novembre 2020
Under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complains of the lengthy period during which she was deprived of contact with her children (the courts took two and a half years to decide; it is unclear
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193720
13 mai 2019
13 mai 2019
application concerns: firstly, the alleged lack of any genuine prospect of the applicant’s release in view of his life-imprisonment sentence; and, secondly, various restrictions on his right to family visits during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207440
21 décembre 2020
21 décembre 2020
lodged on 28 February 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns alleged use of disproportionate force against the applicant (injuries confirmed by medical evidence) in the course of his arrest during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203660
19 juin 2020
19 juin 2020
Afterwards, the applicant started another set of court proceedings, asking to be compensated, as pecuniary damage, for the legal cost incurred during the first set of litigation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248646
17 décembre 2025
17 décembre 2025
MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicant, who was detained at the relevant time, permission to receive visits from his school-age child during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177853
18 septembre 2017
18 septembre 2017
no. 27135/09 Şemsettin İNCE against Turkey lodged on 24 April 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns the applicant’s inability to appear before a court for twenty-one days during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180676
11 janvier 2018
11 janvier 2018
Has the applicant been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, during his stay at the Red Cross reception Centre in Rome, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189910
16 janvier 2019
16 janvier 2019
(victim of the offence) during the trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184387
6 juin 2018
6 juin 2018
December 2008 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201491
29 janvier 2020
29 janvier 2020
THIRD SECTION Application no. 48564/11 Aleksandr Vladimirovich YUFRYAKOV against Russia lodged on 10 June 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an attack on the applicant during
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242820
17 mars 2025
17 mars 2025
Relying on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, the applicant complains that his requests for release during the appeal process were not examined by the criminal chambers of the Court of Cassation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC003003007
6 décembre 2016
6 décembre 2016
The case concerned the alleged lack of medical care for the applicant’s human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during his detention in a prison between June 2006 and September 2007 as well as
Source officiellePage 57 sur 2399
DUCUING, Alain
22/03/2026
Voir →
De HAAN DUCUING, Melvyn
18/07/2025
Voir →
DUCUING, Jordy Mickaël Serge
12/02/2025
Voir →
DUCUING, Clément, Pierre
18/12/2024
Voir →
DUCUING, Paolo Thomas
04/12/2024
Voir →