CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1290
15 octobre 2009
In 2001 the Court of First Instance gave sole custody of the child to his mother. The Court of Appeal ordered a welfare report, to be prepared by the Child Welfare Society.
Page 57 sur 385
ECLI:CEDH:002-5188
26 septembre 2002
It found that the mother had wrongfully removed the child within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202964
11 mai 2020
On 4 January 2019 the High Court set the contact rights for the applicant at two hours six times per year, but upheld the ban on contact with his child by telephone or through electronic communication
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210DEC001995420
10 décembre 2020
the child, custody or access may be dealt with by a Norwegian court if the child is habitually resident in Norway. ...
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0920DEC004032498
20 septembre 2001
The court noted that according to the expert, who had heard the applicant, the mother and the child, the parents’ quarrels had placed a great strain on the child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5088
17 décembre 2002
and may even cause the symptoms of a disease, thus putting the child at risk.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13716
30 juin 2022
Greece - 61657/16 Judgment 30.6.2022 [Section I] Article 14 Discrimination Father of child born out of wedlock unable to exercise parental responsibility without mother’s consent, in spite of parentage
ECLI:CEDH:001-230945
16 janvier 2024
support according to which he had to pay monthly child support to A.S., the mother of his child.
8ème chambre
CETAT:CETATEXT000042844916
29 décembre 2020
B..., ont demandé au tribunal administratif de Nîmes : 1°) à titre principal, d'annuler les résultats du premier tour des élections municipales et communautaires de la commune de Saint-Chély d'Apcher du
ECLI:CEDH:001-205990
16 octobre 2020
As regards the removal of the child, the court of appeal considered that the courts had a duty to take care of the applicant’s child who could not be left alone.
ECLI:CEDH:002-880
6 juillet 2010
At last instance, the Swiss Federal Court ordered the first applicant to return the child to Israel.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC001107902
14 mars 2006
It further prohibited the father from meeting the child.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD007205916
1 février 2022
, mother and child.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-79185
20 décembre 2006
On 1 February 1997, the child was kidnapped by his father and removed from Spanish territory.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145849
30 juin 2014
If the court awards joint custody, it also has to decide, whose household the child will predominantly be cared for.
ECLI:CEDH:001-205297
23 septembre 2020
are not entitled to request a court to regulate contacts with the child”.
ECLI:CEDH:001-163522
12 mai 2016
In January 2011 A.D. started avoiding communication with the applicant and preventing his visits to the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193927
24 mai 2019
The applicant was to see his child every other Saturday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4268
13 juillet 2004
The High Court of Justice had considered that the concept of “child” inserted in the 1939 will concerned only biological children.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13885
10 novembre 2022
They had a child together in 2016.