They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. 5.

    The Court reiterates that, in order to rely on Article 34 of the Convention, an applicant must meet two conditions: he or she must fall into one of the categories of petitioners mentioned

Convention because she only became party to the proceedings on 14 February 2000.

Nor could doing so be regarded as necessary for compliance with the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.

The Court reiterates that, as enshrined in Article 9, freedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the foundations of a “democratic society” within the meaning of the Convention.

The statement could not be understood as to contain an allegation of theft within the meaning of the Criminal Code, nor did it suggest that the applicant was generally insensitive to social needs.

  It stated inter alia that the difference between profits obtained by Cominta Holding from sales, on the one hand, and the commercial value (Verkehrswert) of shares obtained by the company, on the

In that connection, it reiterates that the concept of “home” within the meaning of Article 8 is not limited to premises which are lawfully occupied or which have been lawfully established.

In particular the applicants own, jointly, but in different shares, one third of that property. 8.

of the (agricultural) property she owned. 8.

    The Court reiterates that a person cannot complain about a violation of his or her rights in proceedings to which he or she was not a party (see, mutatis mutandis , Nosov v.

It was noted that in one of the telephone calls, made at 4.39 p.m. on the same day, N.T. had used the word “sheep” to describe the weapons, to which the applicant had replied “The sheep have arrived, why

The matter had further been discussed in a meeting between the applicant and representatives of the municipality on 12 April 2007. 6.

Public interest has priority with regard to the exploitation of the sea coasts, lake shores or river banks and the coastal strip along the sea and lakes.

The Court concludes therefore that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.

She omitted to specify the contents of any such notice and, later, did not comply with instructions to complete her application.

On 29 December 1992 M. was privatised: it was registered as a joint stock company and its shares were sold primarily to staff.

The expert further found that B was incapable of meeting X’s special needs, in addition to being unable to meet the child’s ordinary needs.

She also stated that she had only found out about a breach of her rights in 2013, when she had received the NLS’s reply to her query (see paragraph 15 above).