101, on 5 March 2011 in cell no.   101 again (apparently after a stay in the medical unit), on 11   March 2011 in cell no.   260, and on 1 April 2011 in cell no. 33.

On 14   February   2005 the applicant was informed of the decision and of the fact that he was to leave the country by 26   March 2005.

    The social services noted N.C.’s return in February-March 1982. 47.

On that date, the hearing was adjourned for unknown reasons and the case was listed for directions on 5 March 2008. 14.

In a letter of 6 March 2017 the police informed the Government that handcuffs had not been used on the applicant, and moreover she had made no complaints. 23 .

Ukraine , no. 66561/01, §   63, 30 March 2004).

However, the Court also observes that the applicants continued to receive their pensions until well after 3 March 2004.

The decision was served on 18   March 1998. B.     Relevant domestic law and practice 1.

On 4 March 1994, the prosecutor recorded that this request had been turned down.

  16163/90, § 21, 31   July 2003; and Kin-Stib and Majkić v.   Serbia , no.   12312/05, § 74, 20   April 2010).

On 21 March 1996 the Federal Labour Court ( Bundesarbeitsgericht ) refused to entertain an appeal on points of law by the applicant on the ground that the ordinary courts’ decisions had been consistent

On 10 March 1995 the applicant applied for a residence permit on the basis of the link to his wife.

On 15 March 2017 the decision was set aside by the investigator’s superior as premature.

They are farmers living in Stumm (Austria). 10.

          The applicant returned to Scotland in July 1975 to resume her academic studies.

    On 20 March 2007 the applicant was admitted to a custodial clinic.

The decision of 21 March 1986 15.

    On 15   March 2017 a hearing was held with a view to examining the forensic experts. 42 .

private on 13 March 2012, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.